Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Long Term Investors' Outpost -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (261)	7/25/2002 12:37:45 PM
From: alanrs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 562

"Are you suggesting that the moderated Q thread is a better site for info? Do you think it's due to the moderation? " Very funny. Unfortunately, neither the regular QCOM nor the G&K thread are readable any more. The only constant is change. ARS

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (261)	7/25/2002 12:56:31 PM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 562

Frank, << Are you suggesting that the moderated Q thread is a better site for info? >> Without question. a). "Info" b). Misinfo. c). Disinfo d). All of the above. Along with a liberal dose of all-cheerleding on a "no cheerleading" thread. << Do you think it's due to the moderation? >> No. Its predecessor ("The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company") with "rules" was just as good - maybe better. References to Tero Kuittinen (not just Tero himself) were not banned, and neither was any reference to "The Gorilla Game" although I do manage to toss in a few references to "proprietary control of open architecture" from time to time, and my agnostic views are tolerated (if barely). <g> All that said, a moderated thread has its place. Hoping for good reaction to QCOM earnings. Best, - Eric -