Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: knight who wrote (2628)	7/27/2002 4:09:01 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8273

"...now that we have one enemy more, now that we have a new front again, we'll have to be economical with our munition." ... der gut Soldat Schweik - chicagooperatheater.org k.to - i forgot to put in that 2.61 stink bid on Kinross, really intended to duh, looks now like it can be had sixty cents cheaper, perhaps one loonie ten cheaper .... real breakdown there, two gap-downs to fill, will they fill in our lifetimes, mmmm maybe .... will they fill by October though, this is the thing, and i'm prepared to bet they will .... if not it's going to be a long ride till next spring, with less ammunition for tax-loss time ... but all you can do is play the odds, and i think chances are gold makes before November another attempt on 330, and in the ideal circumstance breaches it, odds of that happening roughly fifty/fifty imho aca.to - on reading Will's streetwire there i was looking at Ashton wondering if it was making a second bottom in the 1.90s, but it has since punched through there a little .... question is, now what ... there is substance and reasonable chances to the company, no doubt about it, still they have to make an economic mine before you get your real payout on it ...... hmm, playing with the fib numbers - 52-wk hi/lo is 4.65/.49, difference there is 4.16, it's last at 1.75, which divided by 4.16 equals .42 .... hmm, maybe it could bounce off the .382 fib number which would be 1.59 .... of course 1.75 itself is only a hair under the .382 of the 4.65 high ... none of this means anything, just a personal habit to muse over fibonacci numbers on retracements There's a long time yet to go in the month of Summer, five full weeks of trading before Labour Day, we'll have to be economical with our munition'