Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (35102)	7/27/2002 9:57:30 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Sounds good to me. He could still talk softly, though. Debka is very interesting tonight. They basically read Negreponte's speech at the UN, where he said any measure condemning Israel must also condemn Hamas, Al Aqsa and Islamic Jihad, as a big GFY to the Arabs, while the US continues to work to replace Arafat and prepares for the strike against Iraq. This time both Israel and Jordan will be helping.

To: Ish who wrote (35102)	7/28/2002 8:53:48 AM
From: Rascal	Respond to of 281500

Sunday 28th July 2002 RIFT OVER SADDAM TONY Blair has clashed with President George Bush over the go-ahead for a war on Saddam Hussein. The PM wants a fresh mandate from the United Nations for any military action. He fears a split in the Government and a serious diplomatic rift between the West and Middle East states if the US and Britain go it alone. Foreign office advisers have told him the present UN mandate for sanctions against Iraq does not cover an armed attempt to topple Saddam. And they insist a new vote for action should be taken by the UN security council, which would need the backing of Russia and China. But Mr Bush wants to press ahead with an attack to wrongfoot Saddam - and before opposition builds up too far in Western-friendly countries such as Jordan and Saudi Arabia. The rift raises the possibility of America going it alone without British troops. The two leaders have privately agreed an attack will be necessary if Saddam continues to defy UN resolutions on weapons inspections. Mr Blair believes a pre-emptive strike on Iraq is necessary after September 11 to prevent "rogue" states sponsoring or carrying out further terrorist acts. He believes public opinion will be more supportive if the two leaders are able to show that every diplomatic channel has been exhausted. In phone calls over the past week Mr Blair has urged Mr Bush to seek the backing of the UN to "legitimise' the assault in the eyes of the world. sundaymirror.co.uk.