Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (21808)	7/28/2002 7:11:28 PM
From: paul_philp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

On knowledge making conversation but not wealth, I'm unconvinced. A broader view of wealth is that if we have all that we can think that we need satisfied, we are therefore wealthy. If the cost of that state is $400, we have no need for more wealth. It is not the human condition to be satisfied. It is more human to strive towards a future rather than be satisfied with the present. Paul

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (21808)	7/29/2002 3:17:48 AM
From: portage	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Still stuck on "it's different this time", I see. Can't wait for the "it can't happen here". Shares represent real values and real assets, eh ? Logically calculated, no doubt. Is that according to Scott Sullivan, or Abby Joe ? I'll stick with the cycles, and supply and demand. Let's see where we are in a few years from now. The general public is just now starting to wake up to the discussions that have been going on at these boards for years, and the realization that maybe something's rotten in Denmark. And my, are they surprised. Buongiorno !