SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bacchus_ii who wrote (85992)7/29/2002 1:59:54 PM
From: andreas_wonischRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Gottfried, there's only one way to prove Jerry's statement: Comparing the yields from Intel's fabs with the yields of AMD FAB30. That's not possible since neither Intel nor AMD disclose that kind of data. Everything else is pure speculation. There are so many factors involved that it is impossible to determine which manufacturer has better yields. Since AMD was never demand limited since FAB30 has been fully ramped up there's no way to tell how much processors it could theoretically produce. While Elmer has offered a reasonable explanation for AMD's high costs and relatively low output there are dozens of others -- including lack of demand (the most likely one IMO) and poor binsplits.

Andreas



To: bacchus_ii who wrote (85992)8/2/2002 2:08:08 PM
From: TGPTNDRRespond to of 275872
 
Gottfried, Re: <As I said, nobody ask to elaborate on this 1.5 sec. partial statement in the CC because it was a kind of empty sell statement.>

Hector's statement in the Q2 CC is a little more robust.

"Our operational unit continued to perform extremely well. In our factory, our line yield, sort yield and cycle times are truly outstanding and at world class levels."

jc-news.com

-tgp