Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Raptor's Den -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (2249)	8/16/2002 10:04:58 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10157

<<btw vlnc went to 40 wave to 15....>> Not because either one of them ever generated significant sales or a penny of profit. It was simply the biggest market bubble of all time that very temporarily drove your two favorite touts to ridiculously unsustainable valuations. And the fact of the matter is you weren't advising people to take their profits, you were still touting them in Feb. 2000 at the very peak of the bubble. Even though at the time, their combined market cap. was in the billions and their combined sales were less than $10 million. stockhouse.com So, you are taking credit for a market bubble lifting two turd stocks to ridiculous valuations. And then, even though you were still touting them at the very peak of the bubble, you now say its not your fault if people "dint make any money." While totally avoiding the fact that anybody who bought either of these stocks based on your Feb. 2000 tout has lost 99% of their money. That's like a broken clock taking credit for being right twice a day, while ignoring the fact it is wrong the remaining 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 58 seconds.