Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (282105)	7/30/2002 11:48:32 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

NY Times castigates Dashole - just doesn't mention his name: The Times' Tom Boys A New York Times editorial denounces "the timber industry and opportunistic politicians" for exploiting recent forest fires "for commercial and ideological gain": The latest and most cynical manifestation of this impulse is a proposal by several Republican senators from Western states to suspend basic environmental laws in order to permit logging on up to 24 million acres of national forest land. The senators describe this as necessary to prevent further fires. Conservationists, quite rightly, see the proposal as an excuse to engage in widespread commercial harvesting in remote areas where wildfires pose no threat to people or property but where the opportunities for profit are substantial. The Times makes no mention of Tom Daschle's effort to enact a similar exemption for South Dakota forests. opinionjournal.com

To: goldworldnet who wrote (282105)	7/30/2002 11:53:54 PM
From: asenna1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"The main prohibition I support against gay's is any involvement in the education of minors who are obviously the product of people who think quite differently." For starters, do you suggest each teacher state their sexual preference before they are allowed in a classroom? "kids belong to the world of heterosexuals and not the world of homosexuals." Isn't this just your "personal belief"? Didn't you just post "It is better when people are law abiding and respectful of each other regardless of their individual beliefs."?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (282105)	7/30/2002 11:57:07 PM
From: asenna1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"The main prohibition I support against gay's is any involvement in the education of minors who are obviously the product of people who think quite differently." TRANSLATION... "Gays should not be allowed to be teachers because they were born to parents who obviously think quite differently" Are you nutz?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (282105)	7/31/2002 12:03:24 AM
From: asenna1	Respond to of 769670

"In a nutshell, kids belong to the world of heterosexuals and not the world of homosexuals." "They are our responsibility and no one else's." "When it comes to education, homosexuals are interlopers" Yep Goldie, you are so Right. I can't see how anyone would ever consider you a homophobe.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (282105)	7/31/2002 12:06:57 AM
From: asenna1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Raise your Right hand and, for the record, state your sexuality." Hey Goldie! Would you trust your kids with an asexual? How 'bout a bisexual?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (282105)	7/31/2002 12:14:34 AM
From: asenna1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Can you except the possibility that your "beliefs" about homosexuality are wrong?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (282105)	7/31/2002 12:31:03 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

In a nutshell, kids belong to the world of heterosexuals and not the world of homosexuals. Anyone who doubts that America agrees with you on this, should consider the hurricane generated by the revelations of depredations of homosexual priests on innocent teenagers.