Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Dave Gore's Trades That Make Sense -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (10330)	7/31/2002 3:39:20 PM
From: BWAC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16631

Hpw the heck did they manage this chart on NVDA with 1/3 of the float trading today? Comments on the stall? finance.yahoo.com

To: Dave Gore who wrote (10330)	8/1/2002 9:52:22 AM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16631

ADVP an ODOD? Story is not new, bounced off $17, now $18.16 Still not good news but since it's not really new info, I believe it is overdone. Some feel it is the work of an overly ambitious prosecutor trying to make a name for himself. Watching... This Market is full of all sorts of surprises. ADBE below $20 with a big warning, NVDA with a huge warning, etc. It still is a market that makes it questionable to "buy and hold" or even "short and hold". ** Re: Old news - add to position by: metropolitan250 Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Buy 08/01/02 09:22 am Msg: 5303 of 5307 Agree. Just read article - what is the story? Company does not want to be bullied by overagressive prosecutor. If anything ridiculously low price already factors in any potential issues - if there are any. :29 ET ADVP AdvancePCS cut to Neutral at First Albany as co returns to spotlight (22.42) -- Update -- First Albany downgrades to NEUTRAL from Strong Buy based on the lack of full disclosure and near-term volatility firm expects following this morning's WSJ article that returns the spotlight to Attorney General Sheehan and his specific interaction with ADVP over the last couple of yrs. While there is marginal new material in the article (assuming it is factually correct)**, it does raise some mgmt issues. Why were the numerous back-and-forths with the government not disclosed in its 10-k filings? PS - see the bolded area? I find that an interesting editorial since some WSJ story have NOT been factual lately or have been very slanted. The ESST story was ridiculous.