SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Howe who wrote (71959)8/1/2002 12:31:38 AM
From: Exacctnt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
<<<<Is jonkai actually arguing something different than this?>>>>

He is saying that FASB 123's "fair value method" supersedes the "Treasury Stock method". I say that FASB 123's "fair value method" is a function of expensing options either on the income statement or in a footnote. It doesn't deal with the calculation of diluted share count. The "Treasury Account method" actually determines the number of shares attributed to dilution. No matter how options are expensed the number of diluted shares has to be determined. That's what the Treasury Stock method does. He has shown me nothing in his links or purported research that says the Treasury Stock method will no longer be used.



To: David Howe who wrote (71959)8/1/2002 10:53:28 AM
From: jonkai  Respond to of 74651
 
That's an extremely reasonable method of accounting for dilution due to options

you should talk to Standards and Poors, and GE and Alan Greenspan and Warren Buffett and Arthur Levitt, and the two companies a day that are switching why your opinion has little merit...

when you have this many and this type of people that are in disagreement with your opinion, then you should redouble your efforts as to what your opinion really should be....

jon.