Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (122568)	8/1/2002 11:53:20 AM
From: qveauriche	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

In my profession I deal regularly with shysters who make inflammatory and unsubstantiated arguments, and who are adept at changing the subject when the ludicrous nature, or outright falsity, of their arguments are exposed. So Seybold is a shameless CDMA tout, but you can't provide single example as to why, so you respond that "QCOM longs couldn't understand anyway." Then you're off again claiming that Nokia holds the most cdma IPR (which is alot like someone claiming with a straight face that the world is flat), and when a 3 minute Google search blows that suggestion to smithereens now the topic suddenly changes to the size of my portfolio. I am thrilled we have shorts here. Some of them add tremendously to the collective wisdom of the board. Much more than I ever have. This isn't about longs vs shorts. This is about people who want to bring useful information to the board (be they long or short) for the purpose of debate and analysis vs know-nothing little twits who are here to taunt and aggravate. Your rabid bias has long been evident.But today you exposed yourself to be a true chucklehead as well. As much lip as you dish out on this thread, it couldn't have happened to a more deserving person.