SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: long-gone who wrote (88471)8/1/2002 3:26:11 PM
From: grusum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116764
 
Lewis says "The great gold rally of 2002 may already have run its course". Notice a little lack of objectivity in that statement? When he says 'the great gold rally of 2002' he has already put it in the past.

Near as i can tell, his only argument is what has happened in the past, like 'if people bought gold at $850 in 1980 they have watched their investment shrivel'. Well no kidding! I wonder how long that fact has been evident to him? He chooses the highest point in gold's history 22 years ago to make his point for the bear market?

Where is his analysis of present day events such as world economics, the effect on world currencies, hedging, mining production, supply and demand and a few more that i can't think of off hand.

This was the weakest claim for a bear market in gold that i've ever read, and if it's the best the bears can do, then i still feel mighty good about being a gold bull…



To: long-gone who wrote (88471)8/1/2002 5:22:26 PM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116764
 
> but this must have gone to press prior to today's move...

I will never understand why you get so excited about $1.50 moves,
especially only when they are up and not down <g>

We are not even back to where we started Wednesday AM
quotes.ino.com

Notice we hit $299.10 intraday ? Good thing it popped back, hope $300 support will hold, although $290 is still a possibility.