Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (86204)	8/1/2002 4:54:48 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 275872

Petz, Re: "Its an analog technology, so it is 4 times more difficult to double the bits in a cell." What a bold statement, Petz. How "insightful". Not really, though, since most designs these days involve analog development. High speed signaling is one example. When you look at waveforms, you no longer see squarewaves, but rather sharp spikes. But most engineers already know how to deal with this. Your claim that things will be "difficult" for Intel goes without saying, but it was also "difficult" for AMD to get 2 bits per cell using their method - they took years developing it. On the other hand, I fully expect AMDroid logic to tell you that there is no other practical way to achieve what AMD has achieved, nor should anyone bother to try. wbmw