SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nemer who wrote (42444)8/1/2002 9:56:46 PM
From: Larry S.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53068
 
WMB cut deal with Buffett and Lehman, but are they selling the prized assets in trying to stay alive?: biz.yahoo.com I think Buffett is going to do something really BIG in the IPP sector soon. he's just been nibbling. larry

more on wmb deal from wsj:
New $3.4 Billion Fund Package
Will Help Williams Streamline
Sales of Pipelines and Gas Properties, Loans
Are Set to Cover Debt Through Year End

By CHIP CUMMINS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

With a new load of cash from asset sales and loans, Williams Cos. bought itself some
valuable time as it tries to rein in its troubled energy-trading business.

The Tulsa, Okla., energy concern said Thursday that it agreed to sell $1.8 billion in
pipelines, natural-gas properties and other assets, and had lined up financing from
banks and Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Altogether, Williams will have about $3.4 billion in cash and available credit, enough
to help it pull out of a near-crippling plunge into energy trading and allow it to pay off
debt maturing through the end of the year. The company's stock, which dove under
$1 last week, jumped 85 cents, or 29%, to $3.80 in 4 p.m. in New York Stock
Exchange composite trading.

Williams executives, in a conference call, said the company has received bids for
parts of its energy-trading portfolio as it moves to further reduce its financial
exposure to that business. The company also said it is still discussing a joint venture
involving the trading floor with at least two serious investors.

The fire sale is a dizzying about-face from just a year ago, when Williams was
snapping up assets that executives believed would bolster trading profits. But the
once-bright prospects for energy trading have been all but extinguished following
Enron Corp.'s fantastic failure and a handful of federal inquiries focused on
accounting and trading shenanigans in the sector.

Late last year, Williams embarked on a series of asset sales and other debt-reduction
initiatives to strengthen its balance sheet. Executives said Thursday's sales wouldn't
be the last. "We are moving ahead and pursuing additional asset sales, again very
aggressively," said Steve Malcolm, Williams's chairman and chief executive.

Mr. Malcolm said Williams is considering additional sales but will stay focused on its
core businesses: natural-gas pipelines, "midstream" businesses such as liquids storage
and processing facilities, and exploration and production.

The sales -- along with about $2 billion in new financing from banks and Mr. Buffett
-- provide Williams with a lifeline as it struggles to meet mounting debt and rebuild its
damaged credit. Williams said the company repaid $800 million in debt due this week
and will now be able to cover $1.8 billion in further debt payments due through the
end of the year.

But the company still has challenges ahead related to decisions made in the last few
years. Starting in 1998, Williams traders began to sign long-term electricity deals with
power-plant operators, agreeing to provide natural gas to the plants and pay a fee for
the right to sell their electricity in newly deregulated markets. Last summer, Williams
paid about $2.38 billion in cash and stock for Barrett Resources Corp., calling the gas
exploration and production company the perfect "natural hedge" for those trading
deals.

When the deals were signed, the price spreads between natural gas and electricity
made the arrangements look like a big moneymaker. Those spreads have since
collapsed.

As part of the deals, Williams committed itself to providing about $8 billion in natural
gas and fees in the next two decades. If the price spread between electricity and gas
stays depressed, some of Williams's options to sell the plants' electricity may prove
worthless. And now, the Barrett properties backing up those deals are the collateral
securing some of Williams's new financing.

Other assets Williams invested in -- in part for their trading opportunities -- have been
shed completely. Natural gas from Williams's interest in the Jonah field in Wyoming
once flowed through the company's Kern River natural-gas pipeline to the deregulated
California market. EnCana Corp. now owns Williams's Jonah interest, and
MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co., a unit of Mr. Buffett's Berkshire, bought Kern
River Gas Transmission Co. from Williams in March.

The company said it expects to have about $2 billion in cash on hand at the end of the
year, up from just over $400 million earlier this week. "We are cash-rich today," Mr.
Malcolm said.

Williams confirmed that it expanded a revolving credit line from Citigroup Inc., giving
it access to about $1.1 billion. That facility is fully secured, though the company
wouldn't disclose which assets back it.

At the same time, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Mr. Buffett's Berkshire
provided Williams with an additional $900 million in loans, backed by Barrett's
properties.

Williams said Thursday it sold controlling interests in two natural-gas-liquids pipelines
to Enterprise Products Partners LP, of Houston, for $1.2 billion. In addition, Williams
reaped a total of $387.5 million from the EnCana deal and properties in Texas and
Oklahoma sold to Chesapeake Exploration LP. It also agreed to sell a
liquefied-natural-gas facility and pipeline to a unit of Dominion Resources Inc. for
$217 million. That deal is expected to close in 45 days.



To: Nemer who wrote (42444)8/2/2002 7:56:35 AM
From: Ron McKinnon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 53068
 
to summarize for those who don't want to go read all those posts:

>>>I run *(culled DOWN to thirty six screens )

>>>*(and have been diligently working on simplification for three years now)

>>>I translate the ROC of the ROC of the market price into an acceleration figure in my head to attempt to understand perhaps how much farther and faster the price will move in the direction in which it is headed

>>>can't help it if I have Attention Deficit Disorder and need lottsa lottsa lottsa input to make up my feeble mind

>>>I make hard copies and have them hanging all over the walls, the desktop, on the side of the monitor screens

from SE:
>>>Toss all the crap and throw the dart

from Walt:
>>> I don't think the fourth derivative has ever been named. The rate of change of jerk vs time. I vote we call that one the "Nemer".