Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (15022)	8/2/2002 8:14:49 AM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82325

This is i think explains the whole of it. To:Skeeter Bug who wrote (97132) From: Tommaso Thursday, Aug 1, 2002 4:54 PM Respond to of 97141 Just wait till the Fed (as it will have to, sooner or later) taps interest rates up just a little. A lot of these properties are being bought with super-low variable interest rate mortgages and little equity. A one percent increase in interest rates would mean an increase of 20% or more in monthly payments. Someone with a $250,000 mortgage and a 4.5% introductory rate would be paying--what--$937 a month just in interest. Taxes and insurance would bring that up to perhaps $1300 a month. With utilities (heat/cooling, water, electricity, garbage collection) it could be up over $1500 a month for housing expense. Now for people with $100,000 after-tax and deductions income, that's manageable. But with take-home pay of $3500 a month, that only leaves $500 a week for all other living expenses. Every 1% increase in mortgage rates whittles away 10% from that $500 a week. All this assumes no credit-card debt and no automobile debt. The truth is that a lot of the people in this fix will typically owe $20,000 or more on which they are paying $200 a month interest or more. I know these amounts of money seem astronomically generous to most of the six billion people in the world, but this is the situation in the United States, and to try to support more than one person on a net income of $300 a week or less means cutting out a lot of expenses considered normal. At the moment housing seems to a lot of people a more solid form of wealth than stocks, but it would take only a slight decline in real estate prices to make many "home-owners" in a negative equity situation. Usually there is more intertia in the real estate market than in the stock market. It would be remarkable to see it cracking as fast as tech stocks, but I now think it could happen. This is in Ca. This is lowest priced track i could find but prices to me are very high for this area. newhomesource.com