To: kendall harmon who wrote (21912 ) 8/2/2002 6:31:13 PM From: backman Respond to of 26752 WMB...(which i have shorted and covered today...still holding small position)biz.yahoo.com Friday August 2, 3:57 pm Eastern Time Reuters Company News Sell Williams' bonds after 'Buffett' rally - analyst By Dena Aubin NEW YORK, Aug 2 (Reuters) - Investors have tried for decades to score big by copying the value-driven investment strategies of Omaha billionaire Warren Buffett. Yet bondholders might do well to flee his latest foray, the struggling energy trader Williams Cos. (NYSE:WMB - News), according to a leading independent credit analyst. ADVERTISEMENT An infusion of cash from Buffett and other investors, which eased fears this week Williams might default on its debt, has not solved the company's credit quality woes, said Carol Levenson, an analyst at fixed-income research service Gimme Credit. "Bondholders should take advantage of the Omaha rally to exit this name, since we fear the company's situation remains precarious," Levenson wrote in a research note on Friday. Shares of Williams soared as much as 44 percent and its bonds rose seven to 10 points on Thursday after the company said it had secured $2 billion in financing from banks and the investment company of Buffett, known as the "Sage of Omaha." Renowned for his penchant for undervalued assets, Buffett has sparked rallies before with investments in junk-rated companies. Two years ago, news that he had bought junk bonds of commercial lender Finova Group Inc. boosted that company's bonds and helped breathe life into the junk bond market. Last month, when Buffett and two other investors bought convertible bonds of struggling fiber optic cable firm Level 3 Communications, the news drove the company's existing bonds up by more than 20 cents on the dollar. CASH INFUSION COMES AT A PRICE Based in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Williams has been caught in an industrywide credit crunch following last year's collapse of energy trader Enron Corp. (Other OTC:ENRNQ.PK - News). Part of Williams' recent cash drain likely resulted from increased cash collateral requirements triggered by its downgrade to junk last month, Levenson said. Williams' new financing and some speedily executed asset sales have solved the company's near-term liquidity needs, but its cash cushion is still much lower than it used to be Levenson said. Moreover, the company had to secure the financing by pledging assets, and it gained only a modest extension of debt maturities by doing that, she wrote. Also, the company's sale of $1.4 billion of noncore assets came at the price of some diversification and an estimated $200 million in cash flow, she said. Williams bonds were quoted in the low 60s on Friday, mostly unchanged from Thursday's levels. It shares were down 40 cents or 10.5 percent to $3.40 after closing at $3.80 on Thursday. Shannon Bass, a fixed-income portfolio manager for Pacific Investment Management Co., said that over the long term, the bonds have room to improve further if Williams succeeds in shedding assets and debt. For now, though, they are unlikely to find many more buyers, he said. "I think there's a lot of people that have been damaged in the bonds, and because of that I don't think there's going to be a lot of people looking to necessarily reload on Williams tomorrow," said Bass. "It's going to take time." Rating agency Standard & Poor's is also taking a wait-and-see approach. Analysts said in a conference call on Thursday that they had not yet determined how the new liquidity would affect Williams ratings. "Shoring up near-term liquidity needs the way they did is a good thing," said S&P analyst Ron Barone. "Using (liquidity) is a bad thing, because then they have more debt."