Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavesM who wrote (283458)	8/3/2002 2:27:04 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

The question is not whether or not to destroy Saddam and establish a friendly government in Iraq. It is only a question of timing. As long as Iraq is "in development" the culturally-inferior Iraqi people have a chance to survive and be dragged, kicking and screaming, into the modern world. Once Iraq has become a nuclear power they must be incinerated. Few of them will survive, and the Iraqi threat will be resolved...

To: DavesM who wrote (283458)	8/8/2002 10:16:29 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

One thing we do know....BUSH SR let thousands die at the hands of the Iraqi's helicopters......he was a chicken shit and never demanded Sadaam come to sign the surrender himself or give up his right to use gunships to decimate the only people in the country that could make a difference......so what happened? BUSH gave in and now his son is faced with the same spector of terror....due to his dad's ineptitude in not making the war a final move to take out Sadaam. CC