SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : World Affairs Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (1257)8/5/2002 5:29:25 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 3959
 
The US booboisie apart, tell me who still believes that 911 was masterminded by O. Bin Laden?? As months pass, fewer and fewer people around the world believe that hoax....

Monday, August 05, 2002

MUSHARRAF'S MUSINGS: Osama not behind 9/11

Press Trust of India

New York, August 5:
Nearly a year after hijacked planes killed more than 3,000 people in the US, Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf, a key ally in the US-led war against terror, is not convinced that al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden was behind the September 11 attacks.

Though the US blames bin Laden and his terrorist network for the attacks that destroyed New York's World Trade Center and damaged the Pentagon in Washington, Musharraf said the elusive terror suspect may not have masterminded the attacks.

"I didn't think it possible for Osama sitting up there in the mountains could do it. He was perhaps the sponsor, the financier, the motivating force," Musharraf told the New Yorker in an interview in the magazine's issue appearing on Monday.

He said those who executed the attacks were much more modern. "They knew the US, they knew aviation. I don't think he (bin Laden) has the intelligence or the minute planning. The planner was someone else."

After the attacks, Washington turned to Pakistan for help in its bid to crush the al-Qaeda network and sees the Pakistani President as a key ally in its war on terrorism.

expressindia.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (1257)8/5/2002 9:11:10 AM
From: lorne  Respond to of 3959
 
Fear and Anxiety Permeate Arab Enclave Near Detroit
Muslim Americans Feel They Are Targets in War on Terror

By Robert E. Pierre
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 4, 2002;
DEARBORN, Mich.

To the outside world, the Arab Americans in this community are adjusting well to the heightened scrutiny they receive from law enforcement, cooperating with interviews and proudly displaying their American flags.

But inside, said Don Unis, a U.S. citizen of Lebanese descent, people are upset, anxious and increasingly angry at what they perceive as a war -- domestically and abroad -- on Arabs and Muslims.

Their relatives have been called in for random interviews. Their brethren are being held in U.S. jails on suspicion of terrorism, some without a hint from the government about their alleged crimes. And there is a widespread perception that few Americans understand -- or care -- what they're going through.

Particularly chilling for them were the comments July 19 from a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights -- since rejected by the full panel -- that raised the specter of internment camps for Arab Americans if there is another terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

"They're scared to death," said Unis, 63, who was born in the United States and whose father fought for this country in World War I after emigrating from Lebanon in 1917. "They're singing the song that authorities want to hear, but they're eating their guts out. . . . We still don't have very much of a voice in America."

The Detroit region is home to the largest concentration of people of Arab descent in the United States, with Dearborn the center of that community. Restaurants, schools and mosques cater to families such as the Unises, who have four generations of roots in this country.

But since last September, this place has felt less like a haven for Arab Americans. There has been periodic harassment, the constant fear of bodily harm and the frightening possibility of being incarcerated in connection with the war on terror -- fears that Arabs and Muslims around the country have echoed.

"The Arab American community is always on pins and needles when there is a crisis," said Fred Pearson, a Wayne State University political scientist who directs the university's Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. "Like African Americans, they are an identifiable minority that is likely to be singled out. There are all kinds of daily encounters that remind you of your minority status."

President Bush and Attorney General John D. Ashcroft have maintained that the terror dragnet is necessary to protect the United States at a time when the threat of additional attacks is very real. Secret hearings and other restrictions on normally public information are designed to keep information from terrorists and protect the privacy of detainees, Ashcroft has said.

The Justice Department says that it is not engaged in racial or ethnic profiling and that its war is aimed at terrorists, not Muslims.

But those arguments have not won over many Arab Americans. In Los Angeles and Chicago, Arab Americans continue to criticize programs -- such as the FBI's interview of 5,000 men -- that focus solely on people from Arab countries. In Seattle, Arab Americans complain of being regularly reported to the police for taking pictures of Boeing Field from a tour boat, or for entering a 7-Eleven and then deciding not to buy something, said Rita Zawaideh, founder of the Arab American Community Coalition there.

"Some people will not go to court [even on traffic violations] because they feel they will automatically be guilty," said Zawaideh, a U.S. citizen who is originally from Jordan and owns a travel agency here. "They are choosing to pay a fine instead. . . .

"Women are being followed in their cars for wearing a hijab. One woman had her health insurance dropped by a company that told her, 'We don't sell to immigrants.' We don't know what rules, what rights we have as U.S. citizens."

The Arab community in America has been forced to respond politically. Over the past two decades it has evolved to the point where it can mobilize quickly and team up with other, more established rights groups, said Ron Stockton, who directs the Center for Arab-American Studies at the University of Michigan at Dearborn.

"The community is much more organized than it once was," Stockton said.

Arab Americans -- with an estimated population of 3 million nationally -- are beginning to become influential politically, especially in local and state elections. The community stood solidly with then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush in 2000, after he spoke out against a 1996 law permitting secret evidence to be used in deportation proceedings. Some wish they had their vote back.

Now "we regret supporting George Bush," said Osama Siblani, president of the Arab American Political Action Committee, which endorsed Bush in 2000 and delivered many predominantly Arab American precincts here by a 3 to 1 margin over Democrat Al Gore.

"He said it was going to be a compassionate administration," said Siblani, a Republican, who met with Bush three times during the campaign. "We see an absolutely arrogant administration whose lopsided foreign policy is hurting our original homelands, and we have seen nothing but secret information used against our people here."

The comments by a Bush appointee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights only inflamed the situation. At the hearing, held in downtown Detroit, Commissioner Peter Kirsanow said that "if there's another terrorist attack and if it's from a certain ethnic community or certain ethnicities that the terrorists are from, you can forget about civil rights in this country."

A Cleveland lawyer, Kirsanow later added that another attack could lead to internment camps such as those built to hold Japanese Americans in World War II. "Not too many people will be crying in their beer if there are more detentions, more stops, more profiling. There will be a groundswell of public opinion to banish civil rights," Kirsanow said.

Civil rights groups and Sen. Deborah Ann Stabenow (D-Mich.) have demanded that Kirsanow be removed from the panel. Kirsanow has since said he was not voicing his own views but those of others who fear for their personal safety. The Bush administration said there has been no consideration of internment camps.

But the damage locally was already done, said Imad Hamad, regional director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.

"It makes people more scared and less cooperative," said Hamad, who described himself as an intermediary between residents and law enforcement. "People are scared and intimidated, so they don't come forward."

For a century, Middle Easterners have migrated to this southwest suburb of Detroit, drawn initially by jobs in the auto industry and later to escape conflicts in their home countries. There are Lebanese, Yemenis, Syrians, Palestinians, Egyptians and a growing number of Iraqis.

Mayor Michael Guido said that he has an open line of communication with Arab leaders but that the government must do its primary job of protecting citizens.

"There is a fine line between safety and political correctness," said Guido, who is in his 17th year in office. "Sometimes there's an over-sensitivity in terms of profiling. We're all learning what is the right way to do things."

But many contend that current anti-terror policies are wrong. Last month, a coalition of 60 civil liberties and civil rights organizations called on the government to end policies that cast "suspicion on entire religious and ethnic communities."

"An Arab gets into a car accident and they link it to terrorism. A minor immigration violation and you're linked to al Qaeda," said Abed Hammoud, who came to the United States in 1990 from Lebanon. "We want our government to fight terrorism, not Arab Americans. The government is in a panic stage and they are taking the easy way out."

A candidate last fall for Dearborn mayor, Hammoud is a Wayne County assistant prosecutor who spends his days trying to convict drug dealers and killers. He wants to see charges spelled out against everyone arrested for a crime.

"It scares even me," said Hammoud, who said he will drive to the District this summer for vacation so that his family will not be hassled on a plane flight. "When I charge a murderer, I have to tell them what I have against him. The heart of the problem is secrecy."

But tension is palpable on the streets. Paul Kasper, who has lived in the 4800 block of Chovin Street for all but two of his 47 years, watched recently as law enforcement agents and reporters swarmed his neighborhood after the arrest of Omar Shishani, a Jordanian-born man accused of bringing $12 million in counterfeit cashier's checks into the United States. A local anti-terror task force is reviewing his case for terrorist ties.

Kasper doesn't know Shishani, but he knows his community has changed.

"You really don't know your neighbors anymore," Kasper said, as children rode their Big Wheels next door. If you don't know people, he said, you don't know what they will do. "I don't hate my neighbors because they are Arab. I don't love them if they're trying to kill me."

Unis, an Army veteran, said no one wants to befriend those who would seek to do them harm. But he said it's wrong to assign collective guilt for the crimes of a few.

"Arabs who live in this country are Americans too," he said. "Haven't we learned anything since World War II? Sometimes I don't think so."

iranandworld.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (1257)8/8/2002 3:42:18 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3959
 
The Oil Factor

Until the nationalization of Iraqi oil in 1972,
US and British oil companies controlled
75% of the production there. The nationalization by the Ba'ath
government (which overthrew the US-British installed monarchy
in 1958), sent shockwaves throughout the international oil industry
and virtually ended the US-British dominance of the Iraqi resources.
As Iraq turned to the Soviet and French governments for development
funds and partnerships, the US and British companies like Exxon,
Chevron, and BP grew increasingly concerned about the loss of
this profitable source of oil. In addition, the governments in
Washington and London began to look for ways to regain their
control of these oilfields, as part of their strategy to control
access to as much of the world's oil as possible.

This strategy is what has driven US military
and diplomatic moves in the Middle East since the middle of the
20th century, from the Potsdam conference to the current war
against "terrorism" and its consequent saber-rattling
against Iraq. When the UN (under the United States) began sanctions
against the Iraqi people in 1990, punishing Saddam Hussein was
a secondary goal. The primary reason for these sanctions and
their continuing existence is to prevent any governments from
trading in Iraqi oil beyond the limits set by the US-dominated
Food-for-Oil program.

As things stand today, if sanctions were lifted before any US war on Iraq, the French, Russian, and Chinese would activate oil development and trade agreements they have made with the Iraqis. All of these agreements can only begin when the sanctions are lifted. This is why the US and its subsidiary, Great Britain, refuse to consider any lifting of the sanctions and are marching their respective peoples off to war.
These governments know that the only way they can fulfill their strategic and economic goals in Iraq is by invading that country, overthrowing Saddam's government, and installing a regime willing to do the bidding of Washington.

It does not have to be a democratic regime,
nor is it likely that it will be. It only has to make sure that
the oilfields in Iraq will be controlled by the US and British
oil giants. To this end, the Pentagon and its civilian counterparts
in the White House and Congress are more than willing to occupy
and rule Iraq until a pliable enough Iraqi government can be
cast. Human Rights?

counterpunch.org



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (1257)8/11/2002 5:41:10 PM
From: lorne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3959
 
Chinu. Just some more muslims at play.....

More Hindus Join Kashmir Pilgrimage Despite Raid
By REUTERS
Filed at 6:24 a.m. ET
SRINAGAR, India (Reuters) - More than 2,000 Hindu faithful joined an annual pilgrimage in Indian Kashmir on Wednesday, undeterred by a deadly attack on the holy trek by suspected Islamic militants.

The pilgrims arrived in Srinagar, summer capital of Jammu and Kashmir state, and were bound for Pahalgam, base camp for an arduous 30-mile hike to a cave shrine in the Himalayas.

``Another batch of 2,082 yatris (pilgrims) came here. With this, the number of yatris has touched 90,000,'' a spokesman for the pilgrimage told Reuters.

In Tuesday's dawn raid on a camp near Pahalgam, militants emerged from a pine forest, hurled grenades and fired automatic weapons, killing nine Hindus and wounding 31 others as many slept in tents.

Security men killed one of the attackers, believed to number around three or four. The others fled.

``I'm not afraid. Whatever is to happen is to happen,'' 50-year-old school teacher Pankha Khanta said before setting off from Chandanwari, 10 miles from the site of the raid.

The disputed Kashmir region is at the heart of a military stand-off between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan. It is where Indian authorities have fought a nearly 13-year-old Muslim separatist revolt against their rule.

The four-day trek from Pahalagam takes pilgrims along icy streams and through frozen mountain passes to worship a nine-foot phallus-like ice form they believe symbolizes Lord Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction.

No group has claimed responsibility for Tuesday's raid but New Delhi blamed it on an offshoot of a Pakistan-based, militant group, Lashkar-e-Taiba. The Pakistan government has condemned the assault as a ``terrorist attack.''

Kashmir Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah renewed a call to destroy guerrilla training camps which India says exist in Pakistan-controlled territory -- a charge denied by Islamabad.

``Destruction of training camps across the border is the only alternative to uproot terror,'' he said in a statement. He did not say whether India or Pakistan should destroy the camps.

DEADLIEST RAID

Tuesday's raid was the deadliest in Muslim-majority Kashmir since guerrillas massacred 28 Hindu slum-dwellers last month.

Indian officials said the attacks were part of a militant drive to derail the Kashmir elections that were announced last week.

Political analysts in India expected an increase in the number of attacks before the staggered vote that is scheduled between mid-September to early October.

But, they said, New Delhi was determined that the elections would proceed because they are viewed as a way to restore peace and bolter the legitimacy of its rule.

Many political groups are refusing to take part and at least one militant group has threatened to kill anyone taking part in the elections.

``The perpetrators of this kind of mindless violence would want nothing better than a precipitate Indian response to the latest incident,'' said The Times of India in an editorial. ``It's all the more important therefore we do not allow ourselves to overreact,'' it said, adding the elections must proceed.

India has mobilized a 12,000-member security force along the 240-mile route to protect pilgrims but officials said it was impossible to keep the entire trail safe.

``The route is treacherous and long, which gives militants an advantage,'' a security official said.

Last year, Muslim militants killed 29 people taking part in the pilgrimage that runs from July 19 until August 22. The pilgrims range from ash-smeared Hindu monks to businessmen to elderly women who are ferried in lawn chairs by muscled porters.

India has demanded Pakistan halt militant infiltration from its soil into Indian Kashmir as a condition for ending the seven-month standoff sparked by an attack on the Indian parliament that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan-based militants.

Pakistan says it has stopped all incursions by rebels seeking to join the separatist revolt in Jammu and Kashmir. It seeks implementation of 1948-49 U.N. resolutions for a plebiscite to determine whether Kashmiris wish to join India or Pakistan.
nytimes.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (1257)8/14/2002 3:02:42 AM
From: lorne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3959
 
" Today, in late summer 2002, this goal remains fixed and unchanged.
Significantly, the goal remains nothing less than another Jewish genocide. Arab
terrorism, as a complementary strategy of attrition, is consciously directed at the
very same goal. With particular reference to the Palestinians, the Charter of
Hamas - the Islamic Resistance Movement - exclaims proudly: "There is no
solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad... In order to face the
usurpation of Palestine by the Jews, we have no escape from raising the banner
of Jihad.... We must imprint on the minds of generations of Muslims that the
Palestinian problem is a religious one to be dealt with on this premise.... ‘I
swear by that (sic.) who holds in His Hands the Soul of Muhammad: I indeed
wish to go to war for the sake of Allah! I promise to assault and kill, assault and
kill, assault and kill.’”

" Arab/Islamic plans for genocidal extermination of Israel have never been kept
secret, perhaps because these plans don´t really disturb the rest of the world.
With rampant anti-Semitism again in fashion, especially (and ironically) in
Europe, few seem to recall that, prior to 1967 - when all Arabs were already
screaming for Israel´s "annihilation" and "liquidation" - there were no
"Palestinian territories" under Israeli control. Exactly what was the Palestine
Liberation Organization and the Arab world in general seeking to "liberate"
between 1948 and 1967, when Gaza was held illegally by Egypt and
Judea/Samaria (West Bank) by Jordan? "
Message 17863436