Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (2703)	8/5/2002 8:01:08 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8273

EC, I of course as usual left out the SUB name for further research and discussion, it was the Russian Submarine: TRASH and TRASK ...either way it was also TYPOED below when I left one word out NOT ..i.e. I am still, LOL; NOT as good as you guys in chemistry: ::"" OXYGEN PROPELANT of the Subs' Torpedo enclosed in a pressure vessel (as I was thinking that newer assay method called Pressure Oxizadation (once described t me as a PRESSURE COOKER from a Metals Guys 3 yrs ago)( Chauncey Labs in- near Toronto ?) Method. So pardon the inquiry I do NOT have the special knowledge you folks have as pros. I am all ears. "" SO LETS continue, do you guys see any PRESSURE COOKING analogy in that a TORPEDO is a sealed VESSEL itself and if the whole reaction is ASSumed to have occurred within it as the HSP made contact with the several metals that it does in fact be known to react with, IE Fittings the show said SO I ASSUME...COPPER, BRASS( think of PGMs within a sample as a change would CONS IT WITH SUCH a replication in a test sample ?) and or anything else they use maybe a guess of alloys such as STAINLESS STEEL ( irons ?) not can we carry it on to the extraction side? It just got me thinking about replication...I of course would not carry it out within my place just in case some unhealthy things are with the samples ie ARSENIC or any old lace! Laughs. Thanks for the chemistry..what you think on the premise of the theory is all I was getting at. Without me saying a THEORUM here or Q.E.D. at the end ...OK ChuckaWhatThea YOU SAY then THIS please say that it might work?""..EC said ""...The best way to oxidize cons is the cheapest. It may be possible to burn them with lime and they give off no off-gas that way as the SO2 gets eaten up by the Calcium. Then you can rock them or spin them or whatever (cyanide, etc..)to get the gold out. If there is Arseno in the con I sure would not breath the vapours from closer than about 1/4 mile upwind. To abate that you could try mixing peridotite rock and iron chips in the flue in a ladder screen of sorts. Might work. Roasting is cheap as the con burns so it does not need much fuel to process. You can also run a generator with the heat you produce."" 'PIPE' added just now to fittings: IE ( pipe )Fittings the show said SO I ASSUME...COPPER, BRASS PS - First Draft befor SPELL CHECK...::I typoed in the word BELOW 'DORES' for DOES -this is how i make up a theory I guess in typing way too fast...so I spell check now :: EC, I of couse as usual left out the SUB name for furthur research and discussion, it was the Russian Sabmarine: TRASH and TRASK ...either way it was also TYPOED below when I left one word out NOT ..ie I am still, LOL; NOT as good as you guys in chemistry : ::"" OYGEN PROPELANT of the Subs' Torpedo enclosed in a pressure vessel ( as I was thinking that newer assay method called Pressure Oxizadation ( once discribed t me as a PRESSURE COOKER from a Metals Guys 3 yrs ago)( Chauncey Labs in- near Toronto ?) Method. So pardon the inquiry I do NOT have the specdial knowledge you folks have as pros. I am all ears. "" SO LETS continue, do you guys see any PRESSURE COOKING anology in that a TORPEDO is a sealed VESSEL itself and if the whole reaction is ASSumed to have occured within it as the HSP made contact with the several metals that it dores in fact be knoen to react with, IE ( pipe )Fittings the show said SO I ASSUME...COPPER, BRASS( think of PGMs within a sample as a change would CONS IT WITH SUCH a replication in a test sample ?) and or anything else they use maybe a guess of alloys such as STAINLESS STEEL ( irons ?) not can we carry it on to the extraction side? It just got me thinking about replication...I of cource would not carry it out within my place just in case some unhealthy things are with the samples ie ARSENIC or any old lace! Laughts. Thanks for the chemistry..what you think on the presime of the theory si all I was getting at. Without me saying a THEORUM here or Q.E.D. at the end ...OK ChuckaWhatThea