SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (16414)8/9/2002 3:07:38 AM
From: Simba  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
Yup,

I agree that companies which do not want to expense options as a non-cash expense should not be given the tax deduction. If the dumb shareholder suffers because of dilution it is their loss just as the dumb buyers of dot com stocks. By IRS paying for their mistakes the govt revenue goes down and the people who never owned a single share of this company stock will finally end up subsidising due to increased govt. deficits/taxes. OTOH companies which prefer to compensate by stock or cash deserve the deduction from the IRS. Let the company which gives out stock options pay from their pocket to offset the dilution instead of robbing other citizens.

Simba