SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (18951)8/6/2002 5:55:51 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
Gee, here I thought that victims were the purview of the demolibs. Now the moderates and conservatives are claiming them? <g>

Seriously, if my position is liberal, what do you call those who oppose the death penalty, who are concerned about the pain and suffering of those on death row, who could never serve on a jury that required voting on the death penalty, who worry about innocents being executed, who think that the death penalty is cruel, who hold candlelight vigils at executions? Now, I would think those views are liberal and that my position, which does not oppose the death penalty but merely finds it impractical, is on the conservative side of moderate, although I wouldn't give you an argument if you called it just plain moderate. Hell, even our conservative Supremes found that executing the retarded was cruel and unusual. If I'm to the right of them, I don't see how my position can be liberal.

If you find my position liberal, perhaps you have a very distorted view of where the middle is. Or perhaps a simplistic appreciation of the issue. Or perhaps you merely prejudged my position, reading your expectations into it.



To: Bill who wrote (18951)8/7/2002 7:11:31 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
"That's liberal.
Moderates and conservatives think first of victims. Past, present and future
"

All intelligent people consider the poor and the sick and the afflicted, and those wronged by the State...or the crooked reps of the State. Liberals care just as much for those who are wrongfully convicted and killed as do Conservatives.



To: Bill who wrote (18951)8/12/2002 1:08:03 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 21057
 
<<The purpose of Justice Scalia's article, published in May and adapted from an earlier speech, is not to defend the death penalty -- about which the justice professes neutrality -- >>

When I read this snipped from today's Post editorial and couldn't help but think of you. Seems that he shares my demolib pinhead ambivalence regarding the merits of the death penalty. Hmmmm.