SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (36249)8/7/2002 10:57:47 AM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Senate didn't hear from Iraq experts

This was an important element in the definition of "every single expert" used in #reply-17832809 . The point of Senate hearings most often isn't "debate" in the conventional sense. Ritter, of course, will continue to be pounded on by the neocon bloviating pundits and warbloggers in the weeks and months to come. What the heck, it beats pounding on poor old Stanley Fish and the postmodernists.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (36249)8/7/2002 11:19:43 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Last week's Senate hearings on whether the United States should go to war in Iraq could hardly be given much credibility by any serious student of U.S.-Iraq policy, given the conspicuous absences of Iraq experts who offer indispensable insight.

Translation: how dare you use your Iraq experts, not my Iraq experts? Everybody knows that UN politicos know more about a country than actual defectors from the government. Snort.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News