To: stan_hughes who wrote (186411 ) 8/7/2002 2:32:56 PM From: Knighty Tin Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258 Stan, It is true that a very large firm like Fido has a pretty good and large research staff. But most institutional firms do not. They mostly do "secondary" research, which means they may do "original" research on the top few holdings of the company, but use brokerage research to "follow" the rest. Even the few on which they do "original" research are rarely researched with the depth the street does it. For example, the average street analyst follows 7-12 companies. The average buyside analyst follows 50-100 companies in 3-5 industries. One mutual fund company I worked at, and it was not a small co., had 4 analysts on staff. Our main competitor in town had none. Another smaller fund co. I worked at had 10 analysts, though I was one of them, so that was the equivalent of having 20. <VBG> And they considered themselves research driven. So, street analysts' product is used by the buyside. The buyside pays commissions directed at the research products they found useful. Traders, of course prefer to trade with those firms on the street who make the best markets for them and hate the research direction. I've been on both sides of that question, too, and vote with the traders. A good part of what street analysts do pays for itself many times over. However, the fact is, the buyside analysts and fund managers often pay the analysts who take them out to the best restaurants or golf courses or whatever, instead of those who make the best recommendations based upon solid analysis. The II All-American is famous for rating the analysts with the largest expense account budgets. I think that is stupid. I always voted for the best looking chick analysts. <VBG>