SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (36379)8/7/2002 4:56:23 PM
From: paul_philp  Respond to of 281500
 
Karen,

Here is an introduction.

webreview.com

Blogging is a form of personal journalism. It is also becoming a very effective filtering device for web content. IMO, a massive trend that has just begun.

Paul



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (36379)8/7/2002 5:27:13 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
For a somewhat contrasting view from Paul's, I'd recommend this:

At Large in the Blogosphere nytimes.com

In particular, this bit, where I picked up the "warblogger" neologism.

Whenever such criticisms appear in print, the Blogosphere (the bloggers' term of choice) convulses with narcissistic egocentricity. Bloggers like to disagree, but they are unanimous about blogging's advantages over traditional journalism: greater looseness of spirit; openness to more points of view; a more conversational tone; and a compulsive honesty that has bloggers linking to articles in which they found their ideas. Norah Vincent, defending blogging on the Los Angeles Times op-ed page, went farther and argued that the hostility between the old media and blogs forms part of a larger political war, with the elite liberal media establishment on one side and populist conservative upstarts (often known as warbloggers because of their support for military actions by the United States and Israel) on the other.

It's somewhat of a misapplication to call the locally dominant posters warbloggers, but their day-in-day-out commitment to the cause is probably equivalent to many in the more literal blogosphere. Me, I'm with the "life is short" crowd. I found Andrew Sullivan a lot more readable and edifying when he had an editor. And in a world where there's no particularly popular counterpart to Rush, Drudge, Fox News, or the Washington Times for those insufficiently to the right of, say, Colin Powell, I find the "elite liberal media establishments" line, oft regurgitated around here, rather ironic.

There's obviously a market for all that stuff on one side of the political spectrum, though. As a sometimes poster to the W thread, I assume you're familiar with the "Real American behind W, right or wrong" / "traitor" dichotomy. I think the market caters to that kind of thought.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (36379)8/7/2002 6:06:06 PM
From: Rollcast...  Respond to of 281500
 
OT: Sorry, meant to use "warblogger".