SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (169130)8/8/2002 12:48:05 AM
From: maui_dude  Respond to of 186894
 
Re : "But, in all fairness, the Sun guy might not be a totally unbiased observer of Itanic."

Glad you understand that. Hope your realize that Linus Trovald isn't the most unbiased observer either, when it comes to Intel.

It'll interesting to see when McNealy realizes what HP, CPQ, SGI etc realized years ago. BTW, Can he fight Intel, Microsoft and IBM at the same time ? I am not sure he can fight even one of the three. Something has to give real soon for Sun.

Maui.



To: Dan3 who wrote (169130)8/8/2002 4:54:14 PM
From: Sabrejet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
I was wondering if anyone could explain to me the difference between RAM that is advertised as 266mhz and what relevance that has when compared to 266MT/s. I don't quite know what the MT/s stands for but through my searches, I am only finding clock speeds of 133mhz with 266MT/s.(laptop DDR SDram)

Anyone have any insight? I would appreciate it!

sabre


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News