Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elpolvo who wrote (8236)	8/8/2002 12:30:41 PM
From: Neenny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

6) elpolvo - hey! what happened to my answer? Maybe someone didn't like it, so conveniently they forgot to copy and paste your answer!! <ggg> Did you go against the flow??

To: elpolvo who wrote (8236)	8/8/2002 2:20:12 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

THREAD POLL <cut and paste with your answer below> Should the United States invade Iraq? Why or why not? 1) Gloop - Yes....We need the extra space when we drill their neighbors 2) OMD - Yes....but first we should be very public about the evidence we have of their WMD so the world can stop copping out and claiming there isn't a problem 3) Shootie - Yes, and random killing would be a fine idea. Arming the women and children should also be considered. 4) Jeff- YES and the Saudi's need to informed that they are for civilized society or they are not. They are part of the offensive and they are part of the solution or they are a target that will also be blown to hell. 5) JXM - only if the evidence of WMDs is presented. 6) elpolvo - hey! what happened to my answer? 7) Laz - The Admin had better be d**ned sure it's necessary. This could turn into a quagmire that could make Vietnam look like a Sunday picnic.