Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (54239)	8/8/2002 3:01:37 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

That is the best way to regard it. I just don't like to feel that I am in the middle of a crisis. Anyway, my son has been begging for computer time, and I have a few things to look after. I may return later, hard to say. See you!

To: jlallen who wrote (54239)	8/8/2002 5:14:40 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"No need to revisit. And its really not all that important in the scheme of things." It is important. When you call upon someone for a second time, is “revisit” a proper description of the activity. We don’t say recall when we call some one who we talked to on the phone previously. That would mean we are taking something back, or remembering a past conversation. We don’t say restop when we stop at someone’s house that we stopped at the day before. If we revisit do we still qualify as a guest? If so, we could visit someone, sleep over, leave for a few hours, and return as a revisitor. You could potentially keep this up without end. In some cultures that would entitle you to being served according to the “fatted calf” level of hospitality on a daily basis for life.