SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Lloyd who wrote (16434)8/8/2002 10:41:24 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
Seems like there are good arguments on both sides. However, I like the one that says the tax return should be the financial statement. I like it because it seems logical although I have no idea how that would work in practice as no group of accountants can ever come up with the same tax-owed on an individual's return much less that of a corporation.

If these aren't options but outright stock grants that are held in the treasury as assets, the argument for expensing them seems much cleaner. At any rate, it seems there will be some companies who do and some who don't. The do's being those who don't give out that many and the dont's being those who give out a lot.



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (16434)8/8/2002 11:06:29 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
I think that's the guy who was interviewed on CNBC this evening. I'm glad to see that there are people showing some backbone and resisting the mob mentality that has developed on this issue. Earnings per share are clearly the proper place to reflect the effect of employee stock options, not total earnings.