Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skywatcher who wrote (285266)	8/9/2002 12:18:58 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

Another proof positive of chrissikins wacko mental state. This is not an estimate.... LOL Chrisikins opines, one who opines an estimate and revises it is lying. I say one who opines such is stupid. hmmm.... what is an estimate anyway.... LOL 1.The act of evaluating or appraising. 2.A tentative evaluation or rough calculation, as of worth, quantity, or size. 3.A statement of the approximate cost of work to be done, such as a building project or car repairs. 4.A judgment based on one's impressions; an opinion.

To: Skywatcher who wrote (285266)	8/9/2002 12:28:19 PM
From: Lino...	Respond to of 769670

If you are really concerned about gov't lying, and not just paying lip service (no pun intended, Monica), then this will drive you over the edge...... Thursday, Aug. 8, 2002 9:05 a.m. EDT Novak: Clinton Cooked Government Books? Figures on corporate profits were wildly overstated by Clinton administration statisticians during 1999 and 2000, a government report issued last week reveals, begging the question of whether the feds engaged in the kind of bottom-line book-cooking that has recently seen a number of corporate executives being led away in handcuffs. "The Commerce Department's painful report last week that the national economy is worse than anticipated obscured the document's startling revelation. Hidden in the morass of statistics, there is proof that the Clinton administration grossly overestimated the strength of the economy leading up to the 2000 election," reports nationally syndicated columnist Robert Novak. Starting in 1999, as the report by Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis makes clear, before-tax business profits were overstated by a factor of 10 percent. As the presidential election drew closer, that discrepancy skyrocketed to nearly 30 percent. The bogus figures gave the U.S. electorate a false picture of a thriving economy, allowing Clinton's would-be successor, Al Gore, to campaign as the rightful heir to "the longest economic boom in American history" when in fact the economy had been heading into the tank for two years. Clinton Undersecretary of Commerce Rob Shapiro dismissed the notion that the distorted figures represented any kind of Enrongate-style fraud, insisting to Novak that the agency's Bureau of Economic Analysis is "the most non-political, non-partisan agency in the government." Still, Novak's report has more than a few in the business community wondering when those who presided over the government's fraudulent bookkeeping will be held to the same level of accountability as executives from WorldCom, Tyco and half a dozen other corporate giants now under investigation.

To: Skywatcher who wrote (285266)	8/9/2002 1:21:14 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

The $30 B. Brazil bailout - although it may be justified on solely macro-economic grounds - also accomplishes a political goal: it bails out Citigroup's and BONY's investments which might have been defaulted. (Those investments are at least $20 B. ... and Wall Street is a major campaign contributor for the administration.) The curious thing about the bailout is that it REVERSES the Bush administration's stated policy of doing THE OPPOSITE of what the Clinton administration did in similar circumstances....