To: J-R who wrote (10515 ) 8/10/2002 2:45:14 AM From: axial Respond to of 14101 Hi, J-R,"As I said above - unreal potential with WF10. That is what scares me though - with that unreal potential, shouldn't DMX be reflecting some of that potential in its shareprice??? It isn't, and that puts up a caution flag for me... the old "sounds to good to be true" story..." I'm going to try to address this question, over the weekend. I got the outline down tonight. It will take about a day to write the post, check and edit it, so I may make it by Sunday. Jody Smith: "Therein may be the crux. When I first heard of WF-10 and Dimethaid (so many years ago it's difficult to remember) it was in the same forum of other "mind boggling" opportunities that were later proved to be, literally, dust." Greg Spendjian: "But what gives one a cautionary pause is that none of the big pharmas have jumped to the bait. Presumably the strategists at companies like Merck, Pfizer, or Novartis have looked at and analyzed all the information on WF-10. If that is the case, why aren't they banging on DMX's door (or previously on Oxo's door)? I simply have difficulty believing that they are unaware of the information about it. Anyway ... I'm not trying to downplay the WF-10 possibilities here. I'm just trying to explain how come we on this board are the only brilliant ones ... when it comes to seeing them." Skepticism, cynicism, and a whole range of emotions ending at the malicious anger exhibited by some bashers on Stockhouse pervade the DMX threads. I'll try to lay it out as I see it: not as a reason to buy DMX. The casual reader will probably not even finish the post - and those whose minds are closed will automatically reject what is written. That's the way it's getting, with DMX and its investors.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "That being said, don't put a whole lot of faith in the # of clickthru's on Stockhouse. They are actually multiplied by 9x... Every amount of clickthru's is divisible wholly by nine... Just thought I'd point that out as someone pointed it out to me..." Try an experiment. Open a new thread on Stockhouse. Make a post. Get 10 people with different IP addresses to click on the post. At the 9th "click", the post will show no viewers. At the 10th. "click" - the post will show 9 viewers. At the 11th - it will still show 9 - all the way to the 19th "click", when it will show 18 viewers. The count is accurate, and yes, it is divisible by 9. The viewer "clicks" are not the same as the advertising "clicks" - for which Stockhouse uses a different counter. Repeated "clicks" by you, because they originate from the same IP address , will not increment the view counter. Your "click" will only register once. Regards, Jim