To: sjemmeri who wrote (15129 ) 8/11/2002 11:51:46 AM From: TimbaBear Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78774 Steven...However, if most or all of the options are going to the CEO and a few of his cohorts, they are (as suggested by Timba's analysis) pocketing all the profits. While that may be offensive, at least the business makes profits available for pocketing. And if an analysis indicates that market capitalization is cheap relative to those profits, the business should be attractive as a takeover by a company that may decide to dump the ceo and his posse, thereby, cutting that 'expense' and gaining the otherwise profitable business... While this is an interesting theory, the only way I can see to play it would be if an offer had already been made by a company whose management is highly respected for its commitment to the shareholder. To hope that a "white knight" would come along someday, or to hope that the current management would be willing to give up the ride on the gravy train for anything close to a bargain price, I think would be too close to folly for a wise investor. I think a more likely outcome to your scenario would be for another group of greedy management to see the value of the gravy train for themselves and thus they would make the offer. I believe the prudent course is for the wise investor to select those companies which are profitable and that have managements who have demonstrated a strong commitment to returning the profits to the shareholder while still conducting a growing business. In the case of your scenario, the wise investor, once becoming convinced of the greed of the management being evidenced by the prevention of the flow of profits to the benefit of the shareholder, if they own the company, should get rid of it and employ their capital somewhere more favorable to their own interests. Even having the money under a mattress would be better than having it at risk in such an endeavor. Timba