Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (37084)	8/11/2002 6:41:38 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Saddam is harboring Al-Qaeda insurgents RIGHT NOW, primarily Kurds, who were formerly based in Afghanistan. Thus, this falls within the mandate of the congressional authorization issued as a result of 9/11. Case closed. Not quite so fast :-) Please feel free to provide indisputable evidence on #1. cheers, kumar

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (37084)	8/11/2002 6:41:38 PM
From: kumar	Respond to of 281500

delete duplicate.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (37084)	8/11/2002 9:19:12 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.' Is the US government contemplating declaring war on itself ? John Walker Lindh.... cheers, kumar

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (37084)	8/11/2002 9:43:55 PM
From: SirRealist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>Saddam is harboring Al-Qaeda insurgents RIGHT NOW, primarily Kurds, who were formerly based in Afghanistan. Thus, this falls within the mandate of the congressional authorization issued as a result of 9/11. Case closed.<< The case is closed when evidence is offerred and proof is agreed upon. As for diminishing the 'tragedy' caused by the attacks, you're drawing a fine semantic line to put words into my mouth and claim intents I do not have. Without responding to my question.