Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Money Supply & The Federal Reserve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (151)	8/12/2002 1:38:02 PM
From: Cush	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1379

Hi Duke. Hi Glenn. I hope we can hear some more reasoning. That would be great. Needless to say, tempers are a little short around here. Statements like unlike a number of posters who like to pontificate on this issue tend to exacerbate an already hot situation. Would you both please try to avoid inflaming things further. I hoped this forum would be place to share information. Let's try to do that. Cush

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (151)	8/12/2002 2:03:11 PM
From: glenn_a	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1379

Hi Duke. ((Other than your cute but useless commentary)) ... just couldn't quite be civil, eh? :) Your post below states very concisely your perspective: Message 17866308 Thanks for that. It makes statements that provide a very good starting point for dialogue. I would like to take some time to research a number of the points you have raised, and provide an articulate and well-researched response. Unfortunately, I'm on holidays in Western Canada and won't don't have access to research materials, so I it will be a bit before I can reply to you post. But I will reply. And it will be a well-considered reply I hope. Regarding the "semblance of reasoning for my positions" (again, almost civil, but a good attempt), I have provided reasoning for some of my positions in past posts on this forum. And I can tell you're just itching to shoot holes through my analysis, so I look forward to providing you further opportunity to do so. However, my following reply to D. Austin should give one example of how I might see some aspects of this area: Message 17865646 Best regards, Glenn