SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richnorth who wrote (88732)8/12/2002 5:30:06 PM
From: E. Charters  Respond to of 116759
 
Doctors are amongst the worst scientists when it comes to extrapolating conclusions from studies. They rarely are educated in logic, statistics or the scientific method, so would not know how to design a study to prove or disprove their hypothesis. It is obvious that This doctor, Valtin, no matter how experienced, is not drawing his conclusions from a specific and targeted study so his facts remain in the realm of opinion, no matter how learned he may seem on the topic. I went over the journals of the American Psychological Association when studying psychology in university and one of the projects we had was to find the the logical, design errors and the erroneous conclusions of reports therein. There are seven major statistical error made by researchers, and one of the most common made by Freud himself was the absence of a control group. Other errors were experimenter bias, too small a sample population and irrelevant or not related conclusions to the intent of the study. The most egregious of the errant group were MD's but general scientists followed close behind with scads of completely erroneous studies. It is important to note that the errors could be seen from the study design itself and the topic so reported on or the science did not have to be known in detail. Valtin here has not used a control group, and is operating completely from prejudice, no matter how well informed he is on the topic. A real blind study where he did not know the consumption of the control or actual group might leave him very surprised. We don't know, of course, but we do know that a proper study has not been done from his comments.

About 10% of the middle aged population is in danger of kidney stones and gout. Greater water intake can benfit them. Also during this very hot summer, some extra fluids would be a good thing, and should be accompanied by electrolyte replacement (Sodium and potassium salts from fruit juices and salt) This "salting" with fluid intake should be done only after dehydration and thirst has been developed and not too much prior, -- and after any rigorous excercise has been discontinued. Consult a physician on this, as there are certain dangers to too great a salt intake during exercise.

Water toxicity is very rare and requires a great intake of water, such as you would get if disoriented on drugs. If working in the bush or outside on a hot day, it is good idea, but immersion is just as good an idea to lower body temperature.

Ingesting hard water is a good idea for heart patients or people at risk from coronary disease.

In general of course one should ingest food or beverages as one's thirst and hunger dictates and not do it by regimen solely.

8 cups of water?

Can't hurt you! Too much of anything is obviously bad though!

This reminds me of the many reports made in journals on the Vapo-Injector Mark III which was a water and alcohol aspiration device for your carburetor which was supposed to improve combustion efficiency, clean oil and spark plugs and improve mileage. Road and Track, Consumer reports and many other magazines did 1 and 2 week tests and declared the Vapo-Injector Mark III to be a fraud. Did not work, no discernable effect. In time the company went out of business.

I used the device for 100,000 miles on a 318 Chrysler. My once rough running, hard to start engine became a purring kitten. Before when I put oil in the car, it turned gray in one day. After vapour injector installation the oil stayed clean for 15,000 miles, still a bright yellow colour! My spark plugs lasted perhaps 3 times as long. Mileage was not noticeably better, but the car had more power, and ran a tad hotter, so it had to be more efficient. In addition the engine was still like new, no sticking valves and with all cylinders producing perfect 150 pounds compression by test. All the authorities had lied. The scientists were wrong. They had not done tests of proper kind and duration. The injector system was truly very good and saved scads of money running an engine.

EC<:-}