Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (149537)	8/12/2002 10:48:25 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580282

I see. You know because you know and that's good enough. No, it is just another argument with no resolution. You say there is no evidence. But at a minimum, Bin Laden has been tied to the '93 WTC bombing, the United States embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the bombing of the Cole. In addition, he has CLAIMED responsibility for the Black Hawk Down incident (although Bill Clinton probably was more responsible) and the Khobar bombing in Saudi Arabia, as well as WTC 9/11. So, I suppose you can argue there isn't any "evidence", and since there hasn't been a f*ing trial yet I guess neither you nor I would know. But I do know he is wanted by the FBI and there is a $25M reward on his head. Since he is a fugitive, I'll assume he is guilty -- although I'm certain you would want to give him the benefit of the doubt. If he is caught perhaps you'll go his bail. What can I say?