Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (37492)	8/13/2002 8:45:16 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Just what are you willing to do once you have the evidence you keep telling us is currently lacking? Whoa, testosterone time again. My question was a simple one since I didn't know the answer. Did we know something more than the stuff being passed around last fall. The latest I read about that was one of two things: (1) either something happened but no one could get any strong evidence; or (2) nothing happened at all. Sounds like a link but a weak one. If you knew more than that, it would have helped to know that. But I gather, from the tone of your response, that you don't. As for my position at the moment, I thought that Greeley post yesterday was excellent.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (37492)	8/13/2002 9:20:52 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Is it your feeling that Saddam must have been involved in 9/11 to warrant military action by the US to topple that regime? IMO, there are a host of other reasons to topple Saddam with force if necessary if we are really serious about seeking out and destroying sources of terror...whether or not it is related to 9/11.... Two caveats. 1. The situation in Afghanistan needs to be completely buttoned down. 2. Bush should seek Congressional approval even if he feels he has solid evidence of Iraqui 9/11 complicity.