SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Commodities - The Coming Bull Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (1424)8/13/2002 11:07:10 AM
From: maceng2  Respond to of 1643
 
Russias Direct Investment, Exports Tumble

themoscowtimes.com

Two high-profile summits with the world's largest financial powerhouses and a pledge by both the United States and the European Union to designate Russia's economy a free market has done little to boost the nation's bottom line.

Investment and trade figures for the first half of the year show that Russia continues to be a net exporter of capital; foreign direct investment remains miniscule; most foreign money entering the country is in the form of loans; and the overall trade surplus is falling.

The figures, published Monday by the State Statistics Committee, known as Goskomstat, show that while total foreign investment rose 25.2 percent to $8.4 billion in the first six months of the year, direct foreign investment shrank by 25.4 percent to just $1.9 billion. And of the $8.4 billion, three-quarters came in the form of loans and corporate bonds, half of which should be repaid in less than one year.

In addition, the committee said exports in the period dropped 7 percent to $46.7 billion, while imports rose 5 percent to $20.5 billion, giving Russia an overall trade surplus of $26.1 billion, down 14.7 over the first half of 2001. It also said energy resources accounted for 56.1 percent of total exports to non-CIS countries.

"The picture is very sad," said Yevsei Gurvich, an economist with Moscow's Economic Expert Group. "Russia still lacks long-term money and foreign investments," he said, adding, "the most important thing about the latter is not the money itself but mainly managerial experience and technology, which Russia needs most."

Alexei Moiseyev, an economist at Renaissance Capital, agreed that at present, inward financial flows are less important than "expertise and equipment, which is what Russia needs most."

Moiseyev also said Goskomstat's numbers could be misleading. "There were several projects announced this year that have not yet led to real investments," he said.

One such deal was Dutch beer behemoth Heineken's agreement in February to purchase St. Petersburg brewer Bravo for $400 million. And a month later, global mining and resources giant Anglo-American agreed to pay $252 million for a 68.5 percent stake in leading paper producer Syktyvkar Forest Enterprise.

"But what worries me more is the significant increase in corporate debt," Moiseyev said.

Russian companies have issued a total of about $2 billion in Eurobonds between January and June.

"From one point, this is good, because it allows companies to expand production." Moiseyev said. "But as far as corporate governance and transparency, Russia remains weak, and this might lead to corporate insolvency in the future," he added.

Niclas Sundstrom, Russia analyst at Citibank group in London, said federal authorities should take more control over corporate debt issues. "I think it would be a very good idea if the Finance Ministry, as a part of debt-management reform, would more actively monitor the private sector," he said.

Economists polled said the considerable outflow of money is also a troubling sign, reflecting not only economic reality but also the lack of good investment opportunities and low productivity. However, if reforms continue, productivity will increase and capital will come in, Sundstrom said.

One largely untapped source of investment is the savings Russians notoriously keep under their mattresses, which are estimated to be in the range of $80 billion.

"Russia's savings ratio is 33 percent to 35 percent of gross domestic product, but domestic investments make for only about 10 percent of GDP," Sundstrom said. "The banking sector is often criticized for not transforming savings into investments, but [in a way] it does, though it is mostly transforming domestic savings into foreign investments instead of local investments," he said.

Another development not reflected in Goskomstat's numbers is the increased interest foreign investors are showing in Russia.

Citibank has seen recently "quite a significant pickup in interest from serious foreign direct investors," Sundstrom said. "In our experience, it takes 18 to 24 months for this interest to transform into real money," he said.

"A lot of people are waiting for Putin to be re-elected and will start to commit resources after that," he added, referring to the presidential elections scheduled for March 2004.

In terms of accumulated foreign investment by countries, Germany leads the way, having invested a total of $7.2 billion in Russia in the last decade, followed by the United States' $5.4 billion and Cyprus' $4.8 billion.

Oddly, Goskomstat figures show that in the first half of 2002 alone, Russian investments abroad totaled $10 billion, with the United States accounting for just over half of the total -- $5.6 billion -- roughly equivalent to all the money invested in Russia by Americans in the last decade.

However, analysts were quick to point out that this figure was most likely due to Goskomstat methodology, which counts trade credits as investments. For example, Goskomstat, using so-called "double accounting," counts the money companies prepay for goods as an investment even if the goods are not received.

The European Union remains Russia's top trading partner, accounting for 37.6 percent of all trading volume, down from 38.4 percent in the same period of 2001.

Although Russia's total bilateral trade volume with the EU was unchanged at $25.3 billion, its traditional trading partners lost market share to fellow union members -- namely the Netherlands, which saw its trade turnover with Russia jump by 60 percent to $3.9 billion.

Trade with Germany, for example, dropped 7 percent to $6.6 billion, while trade with Italy fell 3.8 percent to $4.5 billion. Turnover with Britain was down 16 percent to $2.1 billion, with Finland trailing close behind at $2 billion, which was 13 percent lower than in the year ago period.

Trade turnover with fellow CIS nations was $11.4 billion, while with Central and East European countries it amounted to $8.6 billion. Trade with China, the United States and Japan totaled $3.8 billion, $3.1 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.



To: maceng2 who wrote (1424)8/13/2002 12:24:58 PM
From: maceng2  Respond to of 1643
 
Brain's 'cheat detector' is revealed

22:00 12 August 02

NewScientist.com news service

Part of the human brain is dedicated to detecting cheats, say evolutionary psychologists, after a study with a brain-damaged man.

"We think it develops in all normal individuals, and that it develops in part because our brains were selected to develop this competence," says John Tooby at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Tooby and his colleagues studied a man who suffered accidental damage to the limbic system, a brain region involved in processing emotional and social information. RM, as he is referred to, performed as well as other people on one set of reasoning problems, did much worse on problems specifically designed to test reasoning about social exchanges.

At its simplest, social exchange runs along the lines of "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours". Previous work has shown that people, and some animals, are extremely good at keeping a check of who owes who within a group - and at spotting and punishing cheaters.

Researchers had proposed that general reasoning abilities could account for this. But RM's deficit suggests that detecting social cheaters depends on specialised neural circuitry, the team says.

Their conclusion is "robust," says Nigel Nicholson, an evolutionary psychologist and director of the Centre for Organisational Research the London Business School. "It's essential we have trusting relationships with people in communities where we are highly interdependent for survival and reproduction. Cheat detection is very important," he adds.

Separable component

The first problems given to RM and the 37 non-brain-damaged controls concerned so-called precaution rules. For example: "If you work with toxic chemicals, you have to wear a safety mask." The second tested social contracts, for example: "If you go canoeing on the lake, you have to have a clean bunk house."

RM recorded a score of 70 per cent on the precaution rule tests - the same as the controls. But he scored only 39 per cent on the social contract tests, compared with 70 per cent for the non-brain damaged people.

Identical tests on two other people with brain damage similar to BM's, but with a slightly different pattern of damage, showed that their social contract reasoning was unimpaired.

"RM's differential impairment indicates that being able to detect potential cheaters may be a separable component of the human mind," the researchers conclude in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Utterly unfamiliar

However, if a region of the brain has evolved to specialise in cheat detection, it should be present in all people, the team reasoned. Most experiments are performed on people living in modern, western societies.

So they studied people living in traditional, non-developed communities in the Amazonian region of Ecuador. And they found that these people were equally proficient at social exchange tasks, even when the problems concerned social rules that were unfamiliar to them.

"What is quite amazing about their performance on cheater detection is that it flies in the face of all ordinary ideas about learning a higher level cognitive skill," Tooby told New Scientist. "People are just as good at utterly unfamiliar rules as they are with rules that are personally and culturally highly familiar."

Journal reference: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.122352699 and DOI:10.1073/pnas122352999)

Emma Young

newscientist.com



To: maceng2 who wrote (1424)8/20/2002 7:48:33 AM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1643
 
>> For some odd reason many of your views and concerns are parallel with certain thinking of the British intellectual socialist left <<

could be, but there is nothing socialist about my views. quite the contrary, free trade hastens the onset of socialism. my views are in the conservative tradition.

>> My own "USA conservative" type views I have on several financial matters... <<

as i have said again and again, free trade is not traditional conservative ideology, as much as the liberal neo-conservatives of today would have you believe. i think the problem lies in the fact that these pundits and politicians you see on tv proclaiming themselves to be conservatives are really just a bunch of pseudo conservatives. they are not true conservatives. so i don't consider my economic views to be socialist left and your views to be conservative.

>> In short, when it comes to "opening" our European or Asian markets, the USA is all for free trade. When it comes to anything that might not give the USA an all out advantage, all of a sudden USA national interests have to be considered paramount <<

there is always a divide between trade rhetoric and trade reality. national interests should always be paramount in trade negotiations. the problem is the politicians deciding trade policy here in the USA either don't have a clue as to what is in the best interest of the country, or are powerless to resist the pressures from corporate multinationals.

>> So what are the problems and potential solution?? <<

in my view the problem is the concentration of power in the large corporate multinationals. they are the ones who run america. the politicians are dependant on them to fill their campaign coffers. only when america resolves itself to break up this power cabal will the solution have arrived.

>> - The market is crumbling and the dollar is falling. Where do these problems originate from.... <<

the ups and downs of the dollar are relative. just a while ago everyone was complaining it was too strong. now people have switched to fearing its decline. as for the market crumbling? that is simple. markets go up and markets go down. the markets went up for nearly 20 years so now it's time for them to go down and stagnate for several years. that's always how it worked in the past.

>> ..Dot Com bubble collapse. <<

i think most everyone agrees that it was a house of cards from the get go. never much in the way of lasting business models.

>> ..Accounting scandels. <<

no surprise here either. accounting scandals always accompany speculative bull markets. no one pays attention or cares on the way up. it's only after the whole thing comes crashing down do people start caring about things like accounting.

>> Massive economic advantage over world wide competitors by various methods to ensure the maximum wealth effect for USA business and consumers. <<

well just as karl marx said, free trade "carries antagonism of proletariat and bourgeoisie to the uttermost point."

>> This also results in a trade deficit. Americans don't need to work so hard and can spend more money. <<

well theodore roosevelt did warn us, "In this country pernicious indulgence in the doctrine of free-trade seems inevitably to produce fatty degeneration of the moral fibre."

>> We are practically stealing the food out of the mouths from people in third world countries. No, we don't stop some black guy in Africa from raking and planting his field by tying him up in his shack. It's done more subtly. We simply deprive him of the ability to sell it at a reasonable local price thus ensuing a spiral downward in wealth until he starves to death. We shrug our shoulders and say "look, how sad... he was poor and died." <<

no question free trade exploits the underclass to the benefit of the upper classes. the powerful elite control the course of trade policy in the united states. of course they want to set up trade policy where they can exploit labor and the environment for their selfish gain. they want to get the government totally out of regulating business so they can get busy with their exploitation.

>> Trouble is closing the UN and the IMF directly is not going to make things any better for anyone imho. <<

the world would be a much better place without the UN and the IMF.

>> It's a matter of seeing what the real problems are and the vast majority agreeing on a fix. <<

vast majority of whom? the world? as an american i don't want a global democracy. i become a minority in that instance. i do wish the vast majority of americans could agree on how to fix what ails this country however. but that is a tall order considering how corporatism has got a stranglehold on america.

>> This means world government too btw <<

oh really? and just how do you plan to set up this world government? who is in charge? is it a true global democracy with one man, one vote? seeing how people of european descent only make up 16% of the world population, that hardly seems an option. so what do you propose?

>> It is not possible to shirk from that conclusion if you realistically want to fix some of these problems <<

global government will never work. i don't know why people are so obsessed with trying. globalism is the cause of many of the problems in the world today, not the solution.

>> By responsible government I am not suggesting a whole load of bureaucrats blabbing at conferences wasting tax payers money with a bunch of perks etc talking crapola to no avail. <<

that's the only thing you're going to get with a global government. i don't know where you get this crazy notion that you can have a benevolent global authority. it not only flies in the face of history, but common sense as well.

>> A solution to many of these trade issues, stock market bubbles, wars, starvations, corporate governance problems, and common human decent relations in business is (imho) get rid of the fiat money supply <<

Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency . . . Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which no one man in a million can diagnose." --John Maynard Keynes

>> Farm subsidies to keep the world supply of food plentiful should exist <<

there is no resource obstacle for sustaining the world's current population. the problem is man. in nearly every instance where you have starvation it is because of some oppressive regime.

>> At the moment tariffs are just a USA bash the rest of world tool <<

this doesn't sound like a well thought out statement. for one thing tariffs are at their lowest point in american history, so by your logic we should hardly be bashing anyone. yet that is not what you claim. so you can't have it both ways.