Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (149550)	8/13/2002 10:15:09 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580442

What, may I ask, constitutes "legal justification" in your mind? I mean, if we don't have "legal justification" in this case I really can't quite envision one in which we do. Why has Bush not made this case if it is so clear to you? Why is the world having so much trouble seeing this obvious justification? Al

To: i-node who wrote (149550)	8/13/2002 12:05:34 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580442

we don't have the luxury of going around toppling gov'ts and hanging dictators without legal justification. What, may I ask, constitutes "legal justification" in your mind? I mean, if we don't have "legal justification" in this case I really can't quite envision one in which we do. Rather than answer your question, I am curious as to what you think is legal justification for invading Iraq? After all, you didn't feel Bush Sr. was justified going into Iraq even though Iraq had invaded a neighbor which asked for our assistance.