SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (4504)8/14/2002 12:51:29 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Federal Reserve Sees New Risks for Economy

Growth: As the central bank signals concern about the rebound, Bush tries to boost confidence. Falling mortgage rates could be a bright spot.


By MARLA DICKERSON and TOM PETRUNO
LA Times Staff Writers
August 14, 2002

As the Bush administration wrestled with what to do about the economy, Federal Reserve policy makers signaled Tuesday that they would act to keep the nation from sliding back into a recession though it was too soon to cut interest rates again.

The Fed's statement was one of several important economic focal points Tuesday.

At his economic forum in Waco, Texas, President Bush tried to restore investor and voter confidence. But as his guests met, the country's biggest airline — American — announced a significant restructuring that will lead to the loss of 7,000 jobs.

That move came after US Airways on Sunday sought bankruptcy protection and amid continuing speculation that the parent company of United Airlines might have to do the same. One key analyst voiced his concerns about a bankruptcy filing for UAL Corp., and its stock plunged.

For consumers, there were mixed messages in the economic news Tuesday.

The airlines' actions led to speculation that fewer flights, and less emphasis on the hub system that many airlines use, could lead to higher air fares and longer waits for travelers. Also on the horizon, analysts predicted: reduced first-class service and fewer opportunities to use frequent-flier miles.

Homeowners, on the other hand, got some good news with expectations that mortgage rates, already at 30-year lows, could continue to drop, analysts said. That's because some investors fled the slumping stock market and sought a safe haven in Treasury securities, driving yields on longer-term bonds to levels not seen since the 1970s. Mortgage rates generally track Treasury bond yields.

All this provided a backdrop to the discussions in Waco, where Bush said he and his economic advisors would be getting "a report from what I call the front lines of the American economy."

The report was generally upbeat: Participants backed Bush's initiatives. But the president didn't mention the American Airlines layoffs, and Democrats continued to criticize the forum as a public relations ploy.

In Washington, the Federal Reserve left its benchmark short-term interest rate unchanged at 1.75%, a 40-year low, dashing investor hopes for a quick cut to bolster business and consumer spending. But in its official statement, the Fed indicated that it is now worrying about whether the economy, hit by slow growth and increasing unemployment, will stall.

Chairman Alan Greenspan and his colleagues implied that they are prepared to lower rates if necessary.

"The Fed is effectively saying that the economy is worse than we thought," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo & Co. in Minneapolis.

The central bank's tone rattled financial markets, where bonds attracted money at the expense of stocks. The Dow Jones industrial average sank 206.50 points, or 2.4%, to 8,482.39, though trading was relatively subdued.

The economy's strength in the first quarter, when real gross domestic product surged at a 5% annualized rate, withered in the spring. GDP growth slowed to a 1.1% rate in the second quarter, according to the government's official estimate reported July 31.

Many employers have been reluctant to hire workers, creating a virtually jobless recovery so far. And layoffs continue to dominate in some industries, such as airlines.

Also, after a promising first quarter, orders for durable goods fell in June; and a key manufacturing index showed that growth in the factory sector slowed sharply in July.

Consumer spending, which accounts for about two-thirds of the economy, has remained a bright spot. But the government's report Tuesday of July retail sales showed that, apart from spending on cars and fuel, expenditures were flat. An ABC News/Money magazine poll released Tuesday said consumer confidence fell last week to a six-year low.

But the economy is giving off a number of positive signals as well. Worker productivity remains solid, the housing sector continues to sizzle, and corporate profits have begun to recover.

"If you size up all the numbers, the rebound is continuing. Maybe not at the pace we'd like, but it is continuing," said Mickey Levy, chief economist at Bank of America.

A mixed economy has prompted a cautious response from the Fed. In contrast to its June meeting, when the central bank's Federal Open Market Committee expressed guarded optimism about the economy's prospects, the 12-member group this time highlighted conditions that threaten to squash the rebound that began in the fourth quarter of last year.

The Fed said the slowdown in demand for goods and services that began in the spring "has been prolonged in large measure by weakness in financial markets and heightened uncertainty related to problems in corporate reporting and governance" — references to the accounting scandals that helped crush the stock market in June and July.

"The Fed is clearly worried about the economy," said economist David Jones, president of Denver-based DMJ Advisors, who predicts the central bank will cut its benchmark rate by half a point, to 1.25%, by year's end. "They are ready to cut rates as an insurance policy to keep the recovery on track," he said.

In the meantime, the Fed's decision Tuesday to stand pat leaves its target for the so-called federal funds rate at a four-decade low of 1.75%, where it has been since December. The federal funds rate is the cost of short-term loans among banks. That rate, in turn, is used by banks to set the prime lending rate, to which many business and consumer loan rates are pegged.

The Fed slashed the federal funds rate 11 times last year, from 6.5% in January 2001, marking one of the most aggressive rounds of cutting in the central bank's history. The moves have been widely credited with softening the blow of last year's recession by keeping U.S. consumers spending after the technology stock bubble burst and business investment collapsed.

The housing sector may get another boost soon: The average rate on 30-year mortgages fell last week to 6.31%, the lowest since mortgage-finance giant Freddie Mac began tracking rates in the early 1970s. Mortgage rates are tied to yields on long-term Treasury bonds, and those yields are tumbling anew.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury note, the principal benchmark for mortgages, fell Tuesday to 4.09% from 4.21% on Monday, and now is the lowest since the government began regular sales of the securities in the 1970s.

The strong demand for Treasury securities reflects a number of factors, experts said. For one, many investors believe the Fed will indeed cut short-term rates in the fall, leaving room for longer-term yields to decline as well.

Also, a strong fear factor is in the market, analysts said: Concern that the U.S. economy is faltering, and that the recovery in stock prices that began in late July will be cut short, is driving many investors to put their money into Treasury securities as a safe-haven move.

"Clearly the 'flight to quality' is an issue" in yields' latest slide, said Robert Auwaerter, a bond portfolio manager at mutual fund giant Vanguard Group in Valley Forge, Pa.

The Fed, aware that another dive in share prices could further undermine the economic recovery by hurting consumer and business confidence, wanted to send a signal to Wall Street on Tuesday that the central bank is ready to ease credit again in the fall if necessary to forestall recession, analysts said.

"They do think we're going to come out of this all right," said Louis Crandall, economist at Wrightson Associates in New York. "But they wanted to show they're not blithely ignoring all the turmoil around us."

But with short-term interest rates already the lowest since John Kennedy occupied the White House and with consumers shouldering record amounts of debt, some economists question whether additional rate cuts can do much to juice the recovery.

Although monetary policy has proved effective at propping up the housing sector, Edward Leamer, director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast, said lower interest rates may do nothing to address other concerns weighing on the economy, including sluggish business investment.

"Wall Street needs to see a significant increase in corporate profits ... and business spending," Leamer said. "But Alan Greenspan can't wave a magic wand and make that happen."

latimes.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (4504)8/14/2002 12:59:34 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Dirty Dealings? Bush Is Shocked ... Shocked!

His friends helped create corporate America's mess.

By Robert Scheer
Columnist
The Los Angeles Times
August 13, 2002


Last week, speaking in Mississippi near the corporate headquarters of the now bankrupt and disgraced WorldCom, President Bush consoled fired workers with his shopworn canard that the loss of their jobs was the result of "shady corporate practices" that deeply shocked him.

This naivete, if not feigned, reflects an embarrassing stupidity about how he and his corporate buddies played the capitalism game during the last decade.

Companies like WorldCom and Enron were not a natural manifestation of the free-market capitalism celebrated by the likes of Adam Smith. The corporate manipulators of the market that we are now seeing were precisely the enemy of the "invisible hand" celebrated in Smith's economics classic, "The Wealth of Nations"; they betrayed the solid post-Great Depression regulatory foundation designed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to prevent large corporations from subverting the integrity of the free market.

The fervent deregulators of the last two decades were not interested in a truly free market in which profit is dictated by consumers choosing what they want to buy. On the contrary, although government interference in the economy was corporate America's most convenient scapegoat for its failures, this was also exactly what it wanted. Regulations that suited its purposes were just fine. Corporate America was very much against government action to protect the environment, consumers, the poor or even shareholders trying to read annual reports, but it had no compunction about buying legislative loopholes that the clumsiest of con artists could jump through.

Without such loopholes, snake-oil salesmen would not have been able to transform Enron--a small energy company affected by logical legal restraints on utilities--into the dominant manipulator of the U.S. energy market before it became a flaming wreck.

Similarly, WorldCom was only a minor player until the Telecommunications Act of 1996, pushed through Congress by Rep. Newt Gingrich and Sen. Trent Lott and signed into law with the enthusiastic support of corporation-friendly "New Democrat" President Clinton. At the behest of lobbyists for WorldCom--based in Lott's home state of Mississippi--the senator stuck in an amendment specifically designed to enable WorldCom to grab a huge chunk of the telephone market.

At the time, WorldCom was lagging badly behind the big three long-distance carriers. Lott's legalese, however, turned this to the company's advantage by specifying that only companies--such as WorldCom--with 5% or less of the long-distance market could enter into joint marketing agreements with local phone service suppliers.

The firm was thus free to buy MFS Communications, then the top alternative provider of local phone services, for $12.4 billion and became the first company to provide both local and long distance since deregulation forced the breakup of the Bell system.

Lott was rewarded for his efforts with major contributions from WorldCom to him and other GOP politicians who had propelled him into the top leadership position in the Senate. WorldCom also granted a cool million to help underwrite the Trent Lott Leadership Institute, which presumably will train future politicians to comply with the wishes of corporate lobbyists.

Thus was born the overreaching, out-of-control and fundamentally dishonest corporation that is now in bankruptcy after conceding false accounting of more than $7 billion. Bush condemns such irresponsibility without ever daring to examine its roots. Is he clueless, or is it that he just doesn't want to know?

Bush was in Mississippi not just to console the WorldCommers but to help raise a quick half-million dollars for the campaign of Rep. Charles W. "Chip" Pickering, the Republican candidate for reelection who "represents" many of the fired WorldCom workers. Pickering got that job after being an aide to Lott on the very telecommunications issues that favored WorldCom, which returned the favor with $80,000 in contributions to Pickering.

When Bush said, "I met WorldCom employees who no longer have work, who are disillusioned like me and others about the corporate fraud which is taking place in our country," it might have provided comic relief if the president had turned to Pickering and Lott and asked them whether they were now sorry for creating this monster. Or maybe not; the risk is that they might have turned the question back on Bush in pointed reference to his own sordid history of business shenanigans.

_____________________________

Robert Scheer writes a syndicated column.

latimes.com