SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (88795)8/15/2002 8:04:34 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753
 
<<We know the result that carbon dioxide has on heating>>

but what % of annual total greenhouse gasses come from a single volcano Vs all man's activity?



To: E. Charters who wrote (88795)8/15/2002 10:10:19 AM
From: The Vet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753
 
If the jets can change the heat of the planet that much, it should be apparent to any fool that man made changes of green house gases which are more massive by far than the effect to the jets

It is comments like "it should be apparent to any fool" that expose your bias and agenda. You may be right, but you took one set of isolated and unverified data and then extrapolated that to an entirely different situation to draw a conclusion to fit your opinion. You then berate and belittle your readers should they fail to make the same leap of faith that you did; this sort of remark is the height of hypocrisy (IMHO of course)...



To: E. Charters who wrote (88795)8/15/2002 12:55:00 PM
From: Gary H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753
 
Speaking of Jet aircraft, I once had a business back in the 70's where we were clearing land on the edge of Streetsville Ont., not far from Malton Airport. We pushed a pile of brush and small trees into a pile and proceeded to burn it off. Before long the fire Dept. showed up and said they got a complaint and had to put it out. One of the firemen said the Chief wanted to talk to me. I went up to see him and he told me he had no problem with me burning the brush but as soon as they get a complaint, it has to be put out. He the went on to tell me that it was all pretty silly since the amount of pollution we created was negligible. He said that what we were doing was nothing compared to the amount of pollution caused by Airliner's dumping excess fuel before landing. I don't remember what amount he said they dump, but I vaguely remember hearing that they carry 10% over the required amount needed to make the trip.
Could be wrong. Don't know if that still applies today. If it does, considering the number of flights a day times - - -.
Wonder if there is any stats on breathing disorders among people living near airports???? Wonder if airlines lobby against other forms of air pollution just to get their names off the books??