SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (145536)8/15/2002 8:00:56 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
A few. 1) That IF it's going to happen, I hope that it will be done without the "gotta get the bastards" mentality you have displayed. 2) That whether it happens or not will NOT determine the course of the market, which is contrary to your apparent view that i) if it happens, valuations of tech will collapse because all the stupid investors will suddenly notice huge losses they hadn't noticed before and ii) if it doesn't, valuations will collapse because no one will trust the companies or the market and will pull their money out. 3) That, for anyone wanting to do a serious valuation of a company, the information is already available to properly factor options into valuation models. 4) That considering, discussing and even floating as propositions to be later accepted or rejected, the arguments from both sides of a debate is a better way to resolve the issue than dismissing the opposing arguments based on the simple-minded notion that they must be wrong because they don't support your position. And on a personal note, 5) That you should open your mind and try to understand the meat and bones of an issue before you start butchering the facts and throwing knives at those who try to point out what you are missing.

And if your point was really as simple as "the day... is coming soon" then why all the ranting about evil execs hiding the truth in order to defraud investors, predictions of impending doom when investors are finally let in on the dirty secrets, and arguing to the death a position you yourself said was merely a technicality, but which demonstrates that, in spite of numerous attempts to correct your misconception, you don't understand basic principals, much less technicalities.

BTW, how soon is "soon"? It sounds, from yesterday's news, like nothing is happening soon that remotely resembles mandatory expensing of options. Personally, I'd rather have it resolved definitively, with one standard for all, and sooner rather than later. Give the accounting rulemakers enough time and they will only complicate things more, which creates much more clarity in their employment outlook than it creates for investors. In other words, they'll behave like Congress. ;-(