Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (19390)	8/15/2002 10:22:21 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I missed the "list" being referred to that Laz apparently posted. But, of course, I did not miss your point that the labelling is neither harmless nor respectable. My sarcasm was intending somewhat the same point by pointing out how ludicrous was the implication that the "liberal" educational institution is "contaminating" the minds of children with "liberal" tenets when, in fact, the "Republican" President's and voters have had an equal input into American Institutions, and have always been concerned with the education of all children, and care as much for their children as do "liberals". It is all quite silly, and as you suggest, dismissive of critical opinion and honest debate. Of course, it is "seditious" to criticise the President. It was seditious to criticize Hitler wasn't it? Don't we believe in a strong and unfettered central authority? The sugggestion that America should value "representative" democratic ideals is an intriguing one, however... :-(