Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (38031)	8/15/2002 7:25:37 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Why the hell are you even bothering to continue the argument with me? We're not going into Iraq. I'll stop, though I disagree with you. Didn't realize you were being offended. I certainly don't presume to have all the answers, it's why I try not to confect dots unless they're the size of elephants. Hasta la vista.

To: Bilow who wrote (38031)	8/15/2002 7:46:33 PM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"We're not going into Iraq." I have said this on the board at least twice before. Your conclusion is correct. I once again draw attention to the genius of W's Mandarins in controlling the news cycle. No talk about Israel, Palestine, elections. patient privacy, Enron, hearings on 9/11, etc. In fact, now that I think about it, this is his October surprise. He's going to announce a diplomatic breakthrough and take credit for avoiding a wa! He's got a lot of old smart guys playing this out for him. Just like when he was screaming about getting thrown into the tar pit about making Homeland Security a cabinet post Or Corporate governance. They time it right and than take the credit for it. OYE! What a problem these cold warriors are.