Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (87079)	8/15/2002 9:35:38 PM
From: Yousef	Respond to of 275872

Mani, Re: "Yes I did, I banned him for 2 weeks ... First vulgarity, now outright lying." WRONG Mani ... Here is the post where TP'er got banned for 2 weeks. It was on April 7th --> Message 17297675 The string of posts that I complained about were posted upon his return to the thread on May 3rd --> Message 17421544 TP'er never received a "ban" for this AND he would have been up for a "1 month" ban as per your policy. BTW Mani, you basically called me a "liar" (which I proved you wrong). Do you need to "ban" yourself ??!! Make It So, Yousef

To: Mani1 who wrote (87079)	8/15/2002 9:38:47 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Mani, Re: "Not even sure why I respond. Regardless of what I say, their response is some dramatic accusation or a one liner with no fact to back it up. I am sure this time will be no different." I have provided the FACTs ... You're the one jumping to the conclusion that I am lying. Let's see if you respond to my post. BTW, you're the one NOT supplying FACTs with your posts. Make It So, Yousef

To: Mani1 who wrote (87079)	8/15/2002 10:13:38 PM
From: Yousef	Respond to of 275872

Mani, Re: "Not even sure why I respond." The "silence" is "deafening". I guess I really didn't expect a response from our "unbiased" Moderator. Make It So, Yousef

To: Mani1 who wrote (87079)	8/15/2002 10:22:33 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Mani, Re: " ... but somehow, me taking acceptation to "class A moron", when I clearly stated I would when I started this thread ..." I never complained about you taking exception to the "moron" comment ... I was responding to Petz about 'Droids making vulgar comments to "Bees and not getting banned. I just pointed out one example. Sorry Mani, I just posted the FACTs to Petz ... You're the one who jumped in and basically said I was lying. Make It So, Yousef

To: Mani1 who wrote (87079)	8/15/2002 10:33:07 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Respond to of 275872

I don't understand some guys obsession about this thread I'm actually of the opinion that there are quite of few who are so obsessed with these threads that they should be banned for their own well being. In fact, I heard that since their banning, Engel and Monica have been getting it on fabulously...........together. THE WATSONYOUTH

To: Mani1 who wrote (87079)	8/15/2002 10:44:38 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Mani: I just browsed the last 80 posts on the INTC thread...Seems there is a major "whine in" over their amongst the INTC lead choir singers... I guess "quorum lashing out" by them at others for chastising them for their own unacceptable behavioural inadequecies makes sense to them...at least if they chant it long enough!!! and to think, that I assumed that once the youngest of my 9 children reached 5 years old (several years ago), that I had witnessed the last of such infantile behaviour!!! Behavioural wonders never cease, it seems!!! I'll take the worst of my kids behaviour at any age (even terrible twos) in favour to the sulking irresponsible responses that we have witnessed here )to admonishment for unacceptable behaviour and to that "whine in" currently taking place over on the INTC thread... Man, I feel sorry for anyone who is in any way beholden to that group of "seemingly" (as strongly implied by their response to admonishment for unacceptable/reprehensible behaviour)shallow individuals, if their responses to admonishment in any way reflect their real character!!!