Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (16515)	8/16/2002 12:52:20 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Possibly, but I'm for truth in advertising first and foremost. If he had put it into his model portfolios, I suspect he would have cut it off fairly quickly as it would hurt his future subscription sales. The sneaky, underhanded, lying way that he did the trade leaves him the option of touting it if it went up or covering it up if it went down. I don't think he cares one whit if the QQQs were to go to 10. It's obvious that his one-sided lying infomercial is working as people seem to think he said go to cash in January 2000. IMO, he feels that he won't get hurt any more if the QQQs were to crash to 0 and the fact that his customers would be hurt further doesn't appear to phase him one bit. Lack of conscience? I think so.