SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (38072)8/16/2002 1:41:55 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The Den Beste is excellent. Here is a column from Derbyshire

August 15, 2002 9:00 a.m.
Vae Victis
Rummy to Palestinians.

I am coming under considerable pressure from my reader base to lighten up. My last few columns have been too gloomy, they tell me. Don't I know that this is the land of hope and opportunity? As a new-minted citizen, I should shuck off the cynicism and pessimism of the Old World and lift my eyes to the Radiant Future. Well, fiddlesticks. Before proceeding further, I order you to go here and read why you should listen with patient attention when I give you the bad news about human life.

Done that? Good. Now, having firmly laid down my general principles, I shall throw you a bone. I shall make some small amends by seeking out news items that I, personally, find cheering. There must surely be a few such? Yep, here's one.

Speaking to Pentagon employees about the Middle East the other day, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said the following thing: "My feelings about the so-called occupied territories are that there was a war. Israel urged neighboring countries not to get involved in it once it started. They all jumped in and they lost a lot of real estate to Israel because Israel prevailed in the conflict."

Well, that made me smile. Not only was I smiling at the spectacle of a senior Cabinet officer speaking plain truth ? not something that happens all that often ? I was also recalling one of the better stories in classical literature. This one can be found in Book Five of Livy's History of Rome.

The events of the story occurred in 390 B.C. At that time, Rome was little more than a city-state rising to dominance in west-central Italy. Most of Europe was dominated by the Gauls, a Celtic people. In the year in question, these Gauls crossed the Alps, ravaged the valley of the Po, then marched over the Appenines to sack Rome. They actually burned a large part of the city, and the Romans were besieged at last on their one remaining hill, the Capitoline. However, "the Gallic race," says Livy, "was accustomed to dampness and cold," and could not stand the hot, dry climate of Rome, aggravated by smoke from the burning parts of the city. They were smitten with plague, until they could no longer bury their dead properly but had to cremate them in heaps. The Gaulish leaders were therefore willing to cut a deal with the Romans. The Romans, for their part, were hoping for the siege to be lifted by an allied army that had been away on campaign; but when the relievers didn't show up and food ran low, the Romans were willing to deal, too.

Negotiations were undertaken. The leader of the Gauls, a man named Brennus, agreed that for payment of a thousand pounds of gold, he would withdraw his army. A table was set up with a set of scales to weigh out the gold. Now, the Gauls were a rough crowd, with an easygoing approach to accounting principles: You can think of them as the WorldCom execs of the early fourth century B.C. They brought their own sets of weights for weighing out the gold. When the Romans complained that these weights were too heavy, one of the Gaulish warriors tossed his sword into the balance pan, uttering the words: Vae victis! ? "Woe to the vanquished!" *

Clearly Donald Rumsfeld was in a vae victis frame of mind when he made his speech the other day. There was a war. You lost. Suck it up. Of course, this doesn't play very well with the Arabs. It would have played even worse if Rummy had spelled out the full truth: There were in fact four wars, and the Arabs got whipped in every one of them. Vae victis, guys ? to the fourth power.

When you write anything about the Middle East you get a flood of e-mails arguing the two sides of the matter at great length and with much passion. I've read a million of the darn things. It's been a while since I encountered anything new on this topic, and I don't have anything new to say here. What I have to say is something old and basic, though neither as old nor as basic as Vae victis.

<http://www.nationalreview.com/images/bullet_10x16.gif> Reasonable people (a category from which I would exclude practically all Arabs) agree that the Jews are entitled to an ethno-state in Palestine, simply on long ? very long ? historical grounds. The U.N. agreed in 1948, and suggested a tiny statelet covering mainly Jewish areas.

<http://www.nationalreview.com/images/bullet_10x16.gif> The Arabs refused to contemplate the possibility of any Jewish state at all. They fought, and lost, the aforementioned four wars on this point.

<http://www.nationalreview.com/images/bullet_10x16.gif> They still refuse to contemplate the possibility, and this refusal is the sole and entire source of all the trouble in that region. Even when, as with Egypt, an Arab nation has acknowledged Israel's right to exist, the acknowledgment has been so grudging, so cold, and hedged around with so many qualifications, that normal state-to-state relations have not been possible.

I have mooted before in these columns my suspicion that the Arabs are suffering from a mass psychosis, with the corollary that our ? the civilized world's ? best course of action is to: "Do what you do when you find yourself in a roomful of glittering-eyed lunatics down at the local funny farm. Keep smiling, talk softly, don't make any sudden moves, keep nodding and smiling, and keep a tight hand on the stun-gun in your pocket."

After Rummy's little outburst of honesty, I'm not so sure about this. Perhaps we should try yelling in their ears. Perhaps that might be more effective, by way of opening their eyes to plain reality. "YOU LOST FOUR WARS! GET OVER IT!" Though we should still, of course, keep a tight hand on the stun gun.

* Pronounced "WHY WEEK-tis," at least since German classicists overhauled the pronunciation of Latin in the 1890s. I note, by the way, for those who like to see hubris brought low, that Brennus never actually got his gold. The Roman relief army showed up before the ransom could be handed over, and the Gauls were massacred. The Romans went on to build their tremendous empire; the Celts got some rain-swept moorland in the north and west of Britain, a boggy republic in the eastern Atlantic, and a few seedy bars in Boston and the South Bronx. Vae victis.

? Mr. Derbyshire is also an NR contributing editor.
nationalreview.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (38072)8/16/2002 3:50:24 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Here is another good column from Hackworth on what he thinks is happening to the Army senior leadership. From "Military.com" It is tough to find this kind of inside info.

"Anything, Anywhere, Anytime, Bar Nothing" was the logo the legendary Col. Paddy Flint created for his crack 39th Infantry Regiment in World War II. Sadly, today's Army has almost run out of senior combat leaders like Flint, who was killed leading his men. Without such pros at the top, the good folks at the bottom end up in a world of pain, like our infantry troops did recently in Afghanistan, where their field commander didn't have a clue about guerrilla warfare or mountain combat.

As a fighting force, our Army's in bad shape. It has more chiefs than Indians, and it's organized and equipped for another World War II instead of the conflicts already blinking on this century's warning systems.

While the Army's small-unit combat leaders are second-to-none -- the young officers and the steel backbone of any Army, the sergeants, are dedicated and motivated -- most senior brass are better suited to guiding companies such as Microsoft than commanding an Army barreling across Iraq. They've been trained for management, not for preparing troops for battle or leading them when the compost hits the circular blade.

Help is on the way. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recently gave his four-stars a good shake when he picked Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Jones to run NATO, traditionally an Army slot, and Gen. John Keane to take over the Army. In particular, Keane's appointment will help revitalize the infantry -- the "queen of battle" -- for the fights ahead.

I'm told Ironman Rumsfeld aims to radically change our military to make it ready for terrorism and other future wars that won't be fought -- at least winnably -- with the tactics, gear and formations of the past. Under Rummy, there'll be no more Gettysburg, Normandy or Hamburger Hill "high diddle diddle, straight up the middle" maneuvers. The game will be mainly played by small, agile units with awesome firepower, much like our Special Forces in Afghanistan.

Keane will replace Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki when his term runs out next year. Unless -- since it's highly unusual to name a replacement 14 months in advance -- - Rumsfeld presents lame-duck Shinseki with a solid-gold surfboard and sends him home to Hawaii to test it ASAP.

According to most Army officers I know lieutenant colonel and below, the call on Keane was made in the nick of time. They see Keane as an innovative leader whose long troop experience runs from a rifle platoon in Vietnam to the command of a company, battalion, brigade, division and corps in mainly parachute units, where boldness and fresh thinking are the rule.

Whereas Shinseki -- the father of the hated black beret and the equally disliked "Army of One" slogan -- belongs to the Cold War-loving Armor Mafia. Not only is the multibillion-dollar fleet of technically and tactically disastrous light armor vehicles the present Army chief's baby, he's also been pushing the already-redundant 90-ton Crusader, a billion-dollar Cold War cannon that's about as necessary and functional as his infamous black beret.

Two other members of the Armor Mafia the troops say should join the Tanker's Early Retirement Club are beleaguered Secretary of the Army Thomas White, a former Enron vice president, and Training and Doctrine Command commander Gen. John Abrams.

Now the Armor Mafia geniuses want to change how the Army trains its combat-branch captains with a plan consisting of a computer-driven four weeks at home, four weeks at a training base and two weeks as an observer at a maneuver center. This high-tech, corporate-modeled, semi-virtual course will replace the present six-month, hands-on drill that already barely does the job. Back when I was a captain, the course ran a year -- and most of my peers had at least one war under their belts and twice the time with troops that captains have today!

There's even more mischief on the Armor Mafia's agenda -- moving the shorter training stint from Fort Benning, Ga., to Fort Knox, Ky., the home of Armor, even though the Infantry School has twice the training area and puts the emphasis where it should be: on soldiers, not machines.

While I'm betting infantryman Keane won't buy this dot-com type of training change, Fort Benning should make Rummy an honorary grunt, and every American parent with a boy who wears crossed rifles should send up a silent prayer of thanks.
military.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (38072)8/16/2002 5:48:26 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
or, why the EU is more afraid of us than of Al Qaeda.

Yes I see you managed to turn that into a general statement about the EU. An amazing twist that is utterly untrue at this particular point in the "EU".