Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (16403)	8/16/2002 5:10:15 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23908

Making domestic colonialism out of immigrant ghettoes Oriana Fallacy Will Americans ever escape the gag of political correctness? Probably not, but the Europeans are making a last-ditch effort. Last week the Brussels Times published an article by one of its editors titled "Europe is losing Europe" (Aug. 7). Third World immigration, hitherto an unequivocal subject, is quadrupling the rate of Europe's population growth and creating a new city of immigrants the size of Marseille every six months. Immigration, the Times says, is transforming Europe into "a foreign land." European society is being utterly transformed "against the wishes of the majority of the population, damaging quality of life and social cohesion, exacerbating the housing crisis and congestion," and burdening the health service to the breaking point. Finding the situation "so extreme and so damaging," the Times editor writes that "veiled racism is no longer an option." Europe is literally disappearing. In many European cities "you can wander around for hours without seeing a white face, one monoculture having replaced another." Yet, "immigration celebrationists" continue "to brainwash the European public into thinking that it is all for their own good. But almost every reason given to support this immigration is bogus." "In the past five years," the Times says, "while the white population grew by 1 percent, the North African community grew by 30 percent, the black African population by 37 percent and the Turkish community by 13 percent. Whole villages in Algeria have been transplanted to southern French towns." The European political order has broken down. Polls show that without question "the large majority of European people - including around half of ethnic minorities - think there is too much immigration." But public opinion is powerless: "No mainstream political party dare reflect public opinion." European politicians cower before the immigration lobby and fear being called racist, Judeofascist, xenophobic. Name calling aside, the Times says massive immigration without assimilation leads to social fragmentation. More non-Europeans wish to live in Europe than are consistent with the existence of Europe. "The people of Europe have a right to decide who can move here." The Times assertion that the people of Europe - and not the immigration lobby - have the right to decide immigration policy is heresy to multiculturalists. But the very next day (before anyone could burn the heretic) the Daily Mail, Europe's largest circulation newspaper, reprinted the Times article. Thus, debate has begun before hysterical "immigration celebrationists" can shout it down. Sir Andrew Green, a career British diplomat, together with Oxford University demographer David Coleman, has formed a new organization, Migration Watch EU. These developments are shifting the burden of argument. Now immigration enthusiasts are on the hot seat. They must explain why they aren't racists for wishing to destroy Europe with massive Third World immigration. Americans are losing their country, too, but Americans are not allowed to say so. Third World immigration to the U.S. is higher than to Europe. One in 5 of the U.S. population was born abroad or born of parents who were born abroad. This is a massive change from 1970 when new immigrants counted for only 1 in 20 U.S. births. While Europeans worry about losing cities to Third World immigrants, the U.S. is losing entire states. Assimilation has broken down. In its place Americans now endure Third World enclaves or colonies. As the U.S. becomes a polyglot, how can it have any foreign policy? How much longer will the U.S. be able to conduct a pro-white foreign policy and plan destabilizations of darky countries? The outlines of U.S. domestic policy in the New Immigrationist State (NIS) are already apparent. The tax burdens on native-born whites will rise to meet the needs of the poor immigrants. The burden of the federal personal income tax rests on a narrow base of 35 million taxpayers who are, in effect, majority shareholders of the state. The alienation of these taxpayers will intensify as millions of needy new immigrants enter the U.S. each year. The U.S., like Europe, faces extinction as a white fortress. Both worlds are becoming sounding boards for a plethora of Third World cultures. As one European put it, "we resisted Hitler in order to become a colony for Africa, Asia and the Middle East." The U.S. has done Europe one better. We have become the world's colony.... Oriana Fallacy is a nationally syndicated columnist. Adapted from: washtimes.com