SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (38107)8/16/2002 9:33:30 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 281500
 
I imagine the personal indiscretions of President Clinton will be deminimus in comparison to the gravity of the constitutional issues which required a pardon for the Secretary of Defense.

This is off topic for this thread so I'll leave it at this. Subversion of a judicial proceeding by a sitting President is neither a "personal indiscretion" nor a trifling matter....even if he had not been a lawyer......



To: Rascal who wrote (38107)8/16/2002 9:41:27 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Rascal - I'd be perfectly happy to discuss the constitutional issue with you. If you can formulate a rational, persuasive argument that Weinberger or anyone else in the administration violated the constitution, have at it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News