SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (38115)8/16/2002 10:14:34 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Policy debate is a good thing.
A war should never be launched without a vigorous debate. And Bush has yet to lay out his case in its entirety....
I don't see Scowcroft and Kissinger's comments as necessarily ruling out action and containing good advice that we need to analyze all the ramifications before we act.



To: JohnM who wrote (38115)8/16/2002 11:00:58 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
<<...Note that Chuck Hagel says the CIA has "absolutely no evidence" that Saddam possesses or will soon possess nuclear weapons...>>

Just as many of us suspect...I'm sure The War Hawk Richard Perle is upset and is trying to pressure the CIA to dig up something on Saddam...=)

Btw, that was a great New York Times article...thanks for posting it.



To: JohnM who wrote (38115)8/16/2002 3:01:01 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Republican party foreign policy elite is organizing an effort to stop the Bush invasion of Iraq,

That piece should have listed under "analysis", John.