Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (149812)	8/16/2002 12:30:20 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 1574017

Your response was "underwhelming". And before you go off, I don't care that Clinton lied "under oath", the crime is the issue. So, let's assume there is no "crime" (i.e., it is a civil trial, which it was). People should be allowed to lie in civil trials at will? There is no crime, thus ALL lying is tolerable. Your position concerning this matter is TOTALLY UNTENABLE when put under scrutiny. The argument is literally without basis. The argument that it was okay for Clinton to lie in a trial because it was about "sex" is nothing short of absurd when you apply reasoned thinking to the notion. This, of course, accounts for the weakness in your initial reply. You can blow this thread off if you'd like -- it would be totally consistent with the way a liberal argues points (you can read about that in Ann Coulter's excellent book).