Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (169507)	8/16/2002 1:44:53 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Elmer does, of course, have experience in getting people banned, predating the nefarious mod thread. It's an old, old game on SI. Personally, I like it when Intel employees deploy their charms in mass and volume. I'm sure it's a very effective recruiting technique, if nothing else. Their eternal whining about the "right" to do it anywhere and everywhere is something else, though. You do get credit, T, for sticking to your word in one matter anyway. I will be extremely surprised if Elmer or semiconeng can do the same.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (169507)	8/16/2002 2:32:46 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Tenchusatsu, re: <And I must admit, I played that game as well when I got Win Smith banned <G>:> And played it well enough 'till the tables turned, and you turned and ran. You'd probably have been OK there if you hadn't explained your intent. Message 16940667 I didn't see Win Smith running around playing the martyr like your buddy wanna_bee.( But maybe I missed it 'cause I don't usually read the Intel thread. ) But, in any case, I applaud your defense of Mani. "I think we're being a little too harsh on Mani." How harsh on Mani do you think WOULD be appropriate for WE. And who all is included in that WE? -tgp